Lurktacularr wrote:alittledizzy wrote:Anyone who thinks they are together knows they have two separate bedrooms at their own home. Why would them sleeping apart in a hotel for one night make or break anyone's belief? I mean, I'm genuinely asking, because that is just not an assumption I would leap to.I suppose from my point of view, the set up at home is permanent and therefore can't be hidden away or not filmed. In a hotel, they'd only be there for a little while and could therefore either not film or be selective, and therefore get away with just one room (and one bed). Not the case with their actual apartment - needs to be viewer-proof. There's no hiding the set-up there, or using clever angles, or just choosing not to film it at all.
This is underpinned by the assumption that whilst they have two rooms at home, they sleep together in one of them. So the two rooms are essentially for show.
So they I question why they'd need to bother doing that in a place they're only staying for one night. To me the two aren't comparable.
I haven't watched the documentary yet but I'm genuinely a bit surprised about the amount of angst the separate bedrooms is causing. When you're doing a mentally and physically exhausting job sometimes is nice to have an hour or two to yourself whether you use that time to browse tumblr, watch a film or ring your mum, sometimes it's just nice to have the option to unwind on your own, especially when they're having to spend large periods of time together on the tour bus. Whether they are a couple or not (I still think they are) being cramped like sardines in a large bus is going to start to grate eventually. Also, two rooms have two beds, who knows whether both beds really got used. Either way, a few hours apart won't kill them, i doubt they spend every second together even in their flat because even the most devoted couples need time apart