Page 10 of 40
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:19 am
by mintsans
fancy_nancy wrote:mintsans wrote:Do you guys think we can peer pressure them into making a tabletop gaming video for dapg when they run out of prerecorded material for it? It'd be pretty easy to record in a bus, just saying.
id probably pay to see them play a board game after hearing that story about Dan throwing a monopoly hotel at phil

i'd contribute to the kickstarter then haha i also have fond memories of the times they have played jenga on younow. i'd thing they really would bring the bantz in a game of Monopoly, or their beloved Camel up (maybe something role playing based?????? omg d&d with d&p!)
oh top of the page this is too much pressure
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:30 am
by albion
majitzu wrote:
I always like when Dan do this :mrgreen:
i will claim copyright of this whole forum for sharing my content™ unauthorized.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:37 am
by oqua
idontreallyknow wrote:oqua wrote:pixlexia wrote:
I will come back later with a post of more substance but for now I would just like to say:
- Trigger Warning :
- CONSPIRACY THEORY
Dan's signature at the bottom of the rules looks nothing like "Dan Howell." It looks like it says "
Dan Lester." That is all.
Now that I actually looked at it, that's all I can see (the curve of the cursive L and the t seems so clear now ) #phanconfirmed
I know. I can't unsee it.
I also can't unsee
mez29's suggestion that the word in quotes in Rule 6 is "phan."
firmly on.
(do you guys like the new "phan goggles" emoticon? can you even tell what it is? lol)
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:39 am
by gasp
albion wrote:majitzu wrote:
I always like when Dan do this :mrgreen:
i will claim copyright of this whole forum for sharing my content™ unauthorized.
octolevi is Phil confirmed
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:43 am
by albion
gasp wrote:albion wrote:majitzu wrote:
I always like when Dan do this :mrgreen:
i will claim copyright of this whole forum for sharing my content™ unauthorized.
octolevi is Phil confirmed
ill sue my own ass
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:44 am
by coffee pig
oqua wrote:- Moderator Action :
- Hey everyone, Forum Rule #5 states: "Posting of, or linking to pornographic content is prohibited." In light of this rule, I've removed the links to the Phan porn doubles tumblr. This is just a warning. If you want to share material like that in the future, do it via pm. Thanks!
Oh yeah, I completely forgot.

Sorry!
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:57 am
by majitzu
albion wrote:majitzu wrote:
I always like when Dan do this :mrgreen:
i will claim copyright of this whole forum for sharing my content™ unauthorized.
Sorry i was baking something and post it quickly. I wil credit you next time

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:04 am
by alittledizzy
albion wrote:gasp wrote:albion wrote:majitzu wrote:
I always like when Dan do this :mrgreen:
i will claim copyright of this whole forum for sharing my content™ unauthorized.
octolevi is Phil confirmed
ill sue my own ass
Is that... a euphemism...
film it.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:12 am
by majitzu
^^ why is so much butt talking in the forum today?
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:28 am
by jhamba
majitzu wrote:^^ why is so much butt talking in the forum today?
because butts are magical
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:31 am
by albion
alittledizzy wrote:albion wrote:gasp wrote:albion wrote:majitzu wrote:
I always like when Dan do this :mrgreen:
i will claim copyright of this whole forum for sharing my content™ unauthorized.
octolevi is Phil confirmed
ill sue my own ass
Is that... a euphemism...
film it.
im kinkshaming this whole forum actually. even its mods are corrupt.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:35 am
by jhamba
albion wrote:alittledizzy wrote:
Is that... a euphemism...
film it.
im kinkshaming this whole forum actually. even its mods are corrupt.
You can't kinkshame us if we aren't ashamed of our kinks

(anyway, we have the power here

)
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:40 am
by alittledizzy
albion wrote:alittledizzy wrote:albion wrote:gasp wrote:albion wrote:
i will claim copyright of this whole forum for sharing my content™ unauthorized.
octolevi is Phil confirmed
ill sue my own ass
Is that... a euphemism...
film it.
im kinkshaming this whole forum actually. even its mods are corrupt.
idk what you are talking about, I am an innocent soul with an interest in the legal system
and cherries are delicious
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:43 am
by coffee pig
jhamba wrote:majitzu wrote:^^ why is so much butt talking in the forum today?
because butts are magical
The real question is why don't we have a butt emoticon, and how can we get one?
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:44 am
by albion
jhamba wrote:albion wrote:alittledizzy wrote:
Is that... a euphemism...
film it.
im kinkshaming this whole forum actually. even its mods are corrupt.
You can't kinkshame us if we aren't ashamed of our kinks

(anyway, we have the power here

)

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:45 am
by jhamba
bedhead91 wrote:jhamba wrote:majitzu wrote:^^ why is so much butt talking in the forum today?
because butts are magical
The real question is why don't we have a butt emoticon, and how can we get one?
If anyone makes/finds this, I'll gladly add it to the emoticon list
albion wrote:
This is bullying

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:48 am
by oqua
spider wrote:An attempt. Likely completely incorrect.
I like that image, it changes certain things slightly. I think it's good to look at the picture from as many perspectives as possible.
Anyway, I think that the loops of his y's and g's have made us believe certain things that aren't true. Like I now think that the "quotes" aren't quotes at all, and the "Tuesday" isn't really Tuesday. Now it looks like "laundry," and the horizontal line I once saw at the top of the l is really just the loop of the "g" above it.
I do like "Bring," and I also considered that the first word in the parenthetical statement in Rule 5 is the same as the first word of the entire rule. That seems to make sense.
I also believe that the first letter of the parenthetical statement at the top of the page, right under the title, starts with an "f." Could it possibly say
[new form], as in, this is a new form/version of the rules?
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:53 am
by oqua
jhamba wrote:bedhead91 wrote:jhamba wrote:majitzu wrote:^^ why is so much butt talking in the forum today?
because butts are magical
The real question is why don't we have a butt emoticon, and how can we get one?
If anyone makes/finds this, I'll gladly add it to the emoticon list
albion wrote:
This is bullying

:butt:
?
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:54 am
by jhamba
oqua wrote:jhamba wrote:bedhead91 wrote:jhamba wrote:majitzu wrote:^^ why is so much butt talking in the forum today?
because butts are magical
The real question is why don't we have a butt emoticon, and how can we get one?
If anyone makes/finds this, I'll gladly add it to the emoticon list
albion wrote:
This is bullying

:butt:
?
yes, beautiful
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:54 am
by kooshka
Sorry to interrupt the butt talk, I'm enjoying it but just had to say this -Since I had some trouble getting sleep I tried to decipher the rules but what the fuck, I can't make out anything. It's probably not even that the pictures are blurry but that their handwriting is utter shit and I can't understand how any of you have managed to figure out so much.
But yeah I just wanted to say ya'll doing gods work and you should put this stuff to your resumes and apply to the FBI. Wow.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:13 am
by Anonymousse
I'M UP!!
akui wrote:Woke up missing out the Dan's butt discussion, feeling: sad
I'm sorry, we can continue the butt-talk anytime.
daichii wrote:
he even threatened the plants to get a response, like chill Dan... that's why you get no replies xD
Wow, Dan please, Chillaax.
Like he is really baiting Phil.
alittledizzy wrote:
and cherries are delicious
- Trigger Warning :
- :somuch:
albion wrote:

love this.
oqua
Now I can only see Dan Lester, good job.
I saw Dan and Phil in my dream and I probably laughed thought my sleep. Today has started very well.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:18 am
by oqua
Okay, umm, the Lester thing is a "joke."
I feel like the rules are becoming clearer? Maybe? But also there are so many possibilities for everything.
I'm so curious about Rule #6. It's the most illegible and could be the most interesting.
Could the bit at the top say,
[no failure]?
EDIT: NEW THOUGHT
The last character in the thing right under "THE RULES" is 2, not a parenthesis. The first letter is something with a long downward tail, like p.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:20 am
by coffee pig
cherries are yes delicious but...I have tried a more expensive brand, and tastes like cough syrup (specifically Brontex). Also it's really sticky (maybe I WAS SOLD COUGH SYRUP!!?)
For a second there I thought you were talking about lube and I was very confused.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:24 am
by DryCereal
I don't think it's #flatbutt syndrome, I think it's 'cos he's got a crazy high waist, and no hips whatsoever.
stiiiiiiiiiill not convinced by the tweet-splosion last night. Even if we get a LS on Tues, I will claim greenscreen. Clearly I am insane now.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:24 am
by Anonymousse
bedhead91 wrote:cherries are yes delicious but...I have tried a more expensive brand, and tastes like cough syrup (specifically Brontex). Also it's really sticky (maybe I WAS SOLD COUGH SYRUP!!?)
For a second there I thought you were talking about lube and I was very confused.
I was, how did you not get?
And yes, I know the lester thing is a joke
(Or is it , maybe you're Dan?)
Edit: keep writing coffee instead of daddy.