Page 14 of 40

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:57 pm
by nephilimcat
LtrllySusan wrote: Back when we discussed the whole male/female names thing, I addressed why he left the names (although some of which are quite unique and identifiable) in: I think this video was a means for him to "come out" low-key. Leaving the names in had a clear function and might be important for his general agenda.


I wonder how he feels about having to take it down if that's the case. If it's gone, new viewers won't see it and while the phandom will know about it, that is not the case for casuals. And I feel that video was there to show casuals his non-straight identity as well. I know from experience that it's annoying when you make a step into the direction of people noticing you're not straight and then you have to take a step back for some reason :?

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:01 pm
by obscureDnPreference
nephilimcat wrote:
LtrllySusan wrote: Back when we discussed the whole male/female names thing, I addressed why he left the names (although some of which are quite unique and identifiable) in: I think this video was a means for him to "come out" low-key. Leaving the names in had a clear function and might be important for his general agenda.


I wonder how he feels about having to take it down if that's the case. If it's gone, new viewers won't see it and while the phandom will know about it, that is not the case for casuals. And I feel that video was there to show casuals his non-straight identity as well. I know from experience that it's annoying when you make a step into the direction of people noticing you're not straight and then you have to take a step back for some reason :?
I can see why he left the names in as a sort of coming out. If he was trying to maintain the privacy of the others, he could have maybe replaced the more unique names with common ones. If he had just used pronouns and blurred the names, people could have doubted him. Hmmm. lots to think about.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:08 pm
by obscureDnPreference


Here we go!

EDIT: On that week in March: Let me get back to you in two months.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:13 pm
by just
ASK ME AGAIN IN TWO MONTHS I STG

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:13 pm
by BuffyFiona
lmao he just said to get back to him about the week in March in 2 more months I am LIVING

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:13 pm
by liola
LMAO he just said about the week in match "when was that, after we moved? Before Australia??let me get back to you in...2 months"

There we go. He trolled us all

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:14 pm
by LtrllySusan
Also he said it was after they moved. So they actually moved much earlier than we thought (the announcement vid was on April 25).

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:15 pm
by nephilimcat
I knew it. I fucking knew it! Stop the hype, phandom

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:15 pm
by Lucyrg95
two more months...this boy...I swear...fight me Daniel

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:16 pm
by obscureDnPreference
More of the reflections with these glasses.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:17 pm
by malday
They are reflection-teasing.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:18 pm
by Elyanie
2 months?! You've gotta be fucking kidding me.. We should've known

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:19 pm
by liola
I'm now thinking Dan just had a drama queen week and he's still trying to figure out what he can drop on us without being called a liar.

Goodbye to all the fun theories!

EDIT: Dan has now said the word "friend" 10 times just to describe the Lesters visit. He also said he "invited" himself last minute because only Phil was supposed to go. Ah yes he does this a lot, he's NEVER supposed to be involved..

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:27 pm
by obscureDnPreference
liola wrote:I'm now thinking Dan just had a drama queen week and he's still trying to figure out what he can drop on us without being called a liar.

Goodbye to all the fun theories!

EDIT: Dan has now said the word "friend" 10 times just to describe the Lesters visit. He also said he "invited" himself last minute because only Phil was supposed to go. Ah yes he does this a lot, he's NEVER supposed to be involved..
I loled at the fact that he invited himself last minute. Phil would have had to get those tickets together. Phil must have been buying 7 tickets and Dan was like "noooo meee toooo"

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:30 pm
by Lain
liola wrote:LMAO he just said about the week in match "when was that, after we moved? Before Australia??let me get back to you in...2 months"

There we go. He trolled us all
My jaw dropped when he said that and I nearly ripped my face off. Suing for emotional distress.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:30 pm
by liola
But can you imagine if it was actually true? I'm laughing at them maybe being platonic and Dan talking so much about how introvert he is and how he doesn't like socializing, he suddenly has the opportunity to spend the night alone while his roommate is out with his family BUT NO HE HAS TO JOIN!!! I'm dying laughing lmao

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:35 pm
by Ablissa
Anyone's got a counter on how many times he said 'friend' so far? Because it feels like a lot

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:37 pm
by malday
LtrllySusan wrote:Also he said it was after they moved. So they actually moved much earlier than we thought (the announcement vid was on April 25).
So fishy!

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:39 pm
by Artdefines06
New sims with house renovations 0.0 everything I could possibly ask for!

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:41 pm
by liola
Ablissa wrote:Anyone's got a counter on how many times he said 'friend' so far? Because it feels like a lot
I stopped at 12 and that was just when he was talking about Phil's family

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:56 pm
by Sakura Selfie
Just like phil needs to get "breaking the sound barrier" out of his mind Dan needs to get R v Brown out of his, the case he's referencing is R v Wilson and I'm sure I've seen him do this before and it's mildly annoying to me for no real reason, R v Brown is regarding sadomasochism but R v Wilson was the one involving branding.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:02 pm
by alittledizzy
So my guess is the house that they're renovating is just taking longer to get done than they expected.

you can't take my dreams from me

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:05 pm
by citizen_erased
dan liveshow, more like, 'it's ya boy danny massively overhyping new videos again' :sideeye:

(jk, I'm genuinely looking forward to a new Sims video sometime this week)

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:05 pm
by rizzo
So much talk of tea in that live-show and none was actually spilled. What's the point?!

Re: Dan & Phil Part 52: And They Were Roommates

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:05 pm
by Artdefines06
That 72 year old man with your skin was really uncomfortable, especially in light of someone actually getting catfished...