Page 15 of 39
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:41 pm
by isabella
slytherina omg i'm glad you brought this up because i would feel crazy if i had found this on my own and no one else believed me! i swear that music and the greyscale was not in the video originally. i also don't remember the clip of the video game at the very end after the outtake with phil. can we call mandela effect?
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:46 pm
by sinnamonrollphil
slytherina wrote:Sorry this is
off topic but I just noticed something (that some of you may or may not have been aware of before me
you probably already know and have discussed so sorry in advance)
So I've been doing some sketching and doodling tonight and put on some of D&Ps videos on in the background. Cringe Attack came on, and because I was sort of distracted and not really watching that closely, at the 'stealing the pokemon card' sketch of the video, I heard the route 1 music from the games in the background, which in itself I don't remember being in the video before. So I looked up and the whole scene was greyscale with a sort of blur effect around the edges. And i swear for the life of me I don't remember it being like that before? I thought it was full colour?
I mean there are memes taken from that point in the video which are in colour -
And this is how the same part looked when I just watched it -
Nothing very groundbreaking (sorry to disappoint) but it just got me wondering:
a) at what point did Dan make this edit?
b)It must have been at least a year after he posted it to make the change, given that I've watched this video a few times over the years since its upload - so why would Dan suddenly change an old video? Maybe he was just bored and had an idea but if this has been discussed before can someone please enlighten me?
Sorry, can you tell I'm bored tonight?
Okay so my roommate came in and showed me this without telling me and i IMMEDIATELY was like THIS IS WRONG. so i did some digging and i went all the way back through dailyphan's 2013 archive and the stuff they reblogged back then was ALSO grey scale
and im sorry but this is a mandella effect because it WAS NOT ALWAYS LIKE THIS.
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:51 pm
by hollyphan
akui wrote:I'm super bored, so while i was taking some personality test, i started to wonder what deppy's personalities are out of the 16 types.
See 16 types here.
https://www.16personalities.com/personality-types
To me Dan seems like a INTJ, the “ARCHITECT”. Imaginative and strategic thinkers, with a plan for everything.
And Phil is INFJ, the “ADVOCATE”. Quiet and mystical, yet very inspiring and tireless idealists.
What do you guys think? (also what's your type?)
Edit: on a second thought, they could be more perceiving than judging, which make them the logician and the mediator
ahh, I love tests like that. I think this was discussed before, Phil mentioned in a ls which type he was but couldn't really remember. (I forgot, of course, which ls and stuff, bad at it)
I think your suggestions for them could be possible.
But I'm not sure about that test. I took it and got INFP-T (Mediator) but I feel more like a ISFJ (Defender).
Though some points are accurate at the INFP-T, maybe I just don't know myself, who knows.
edit: wow, the english version is much deeper and has so much more information than the short, german version of the test. (the test is the same, but the results are quite short in the german version.)
now I've read the whole of it, I like it even more! Mediator is pretty accurate for me.
I'd love to know D+P's exact results!
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:13 pm
by anathema
sinnamonrollphil wrote:slytherina wrote:Sorry this is
off topic but I just noticed something (that some of you may or may not have been aware of before me
you probably already know and have discussed so sorry in advance)
So I've been doing some sketching and doodling tonight and put on some of D&Ps videos on in the background. Cringe Attack came on, and because I was sort of distracted and not really watching that closely, at the 'stealing the pokemon card' sketch of the video, I heard the route 1 music from the games in the background, which in itself I don't remember being in the video before. So I looked up and the whole scene was greyscale with a sort of blur effect around the edges. And i swear for the life of me I don't remember it being like that before? I thought it was full colour?
I mean there are memes taken from that point in the video which are in colour -
And this is how the same part looked when I just watched it -
Nothing very groundbreaking (sorry to disappoint) but it just got me wondering:
a) at what point did Dan make this edit?
b)It must have been at least a year after he posted it to make the change, given that I've watched this video a few times over the years since its upload - so why would Dan suddenly change an old video? Maybe he was just bored and had an idea but if this has been discussed before can someone please enlighten me?
Sorry, can you tell I'm bored tonight?
Okay so my roommate came in and showed me this without telling me and i IMMEDIATELY was like THIS IS WRONG. so i did some digging and i went all the way back through dailyphan's 2013 archive and the stuff they reblogged back then was ALSO grey scale
and im sorry but this is a mandella effect because it WAS NOT ALWAYS LIKE THIS.
So I found this re-upload of the video from two days after Dan posted it (which doesn't make any sense like what but anyway):
And it seems exactly the same to me (but, I did notice the thumbnail of the video is a screenshot of the b&w scene but in color, so maybe that's where you got the idea it was in color and not b&w?

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:25 pm
by eevee
sinnamonrollphil wrote:Okay so my roommate came in and showed me this without telling me and i IMMEDIATELY was like THIS IS WRONG. so i did some digging and i went all the way back through dailyphan's 2013 archive and the stuff they reblogged back then was ALSO grey scale
and im sorry but this is a mandella effect because it WAS NOT ALWAYS LIKE THIS.
I'M FUCKING SHOOK the Mandella effect is REAL because I remember it in color as well holy guacamole
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:30 pm
by majitzu
I remember it in colour too... What is happening?
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:34 pm
by NarrysCanary
eevee wrote:sinnamonrollphil wrote:Okay so my roommate came in and showed me this without telling me and i IMMEDIATELY was like THIS IS WRONG. so i did some digging and i went all the way back through dailyphan's 2013 archive and the stuff they reblogged back then was ALSO grey scale
and im sorry but this is a mandella effect because it WAS NOT ALWAYS LIKE THIS.
I'M FUCKING SHOOK the Mandella effect is REAL because I remember it in color as well holy guacamole
Same, I'm pretty sure it was in colour before

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:38 pm
by shoe
I don't think it's possible to edit videos after they've been uploaded, and the ripped version being the same also suggests it wasn't changed, unless he changed it less than 2 days after upload.
Maybe we're being confused because all the other sketch scenes are in colour. If all the sketches were black and white, you might remember that the sketches were black and white. But when all the other sketches are in colour, by the end of the video you've forgotten that the first one was black and white, so that detail isn't stored in your long-term memory. Then you come back to it years later, see the first sketch and you're like "wait why are the sketches black and white I don't remember that!".
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:40 pm
by kkell3000
I remember it in black and white I think it is probably because the other clips are in color. Either that or maybe we're in a parallel universe...
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:45 pm
by isabella
BisexualShoeMarriage wrote:I don't think it's possible to edit videos after they've been uploaded, and the ripped version being the same also suggests it wasn't changed, unless he changed it less than 2 days after upload.
Maybe we're being confused because all the other sketch scenes are in colour. If all the sketches were black and white, you might remember that the sketches were black and white. But when all the other sketches are in colour, by the end of the video you've forgotten that the first one was black and white, so that detail isn't stored in your long-term memory. Then you come back to it years later, see the first sketch and you're like "wait why are the sketches black and white I don't remember that!".
That's an entirely possible explanation for why we remember it differently, but I do think it's possible to edit videos after you upload them. I've heard youtubers mention going back in to blur something after an upload. ETA: This video doesn't seem to have been edited though as evidenced by the gifs and the re-uploaded video others have posted.
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:55 pm
by blueapple_x
I think I actually remember it being in black and white because I remember it as a "stereotypical black and white flashback" scene. I think anathema is correct in that because the thumbnail is in colour, some people thought that scene in the vid was in colour too?
It is possible to edit videos after uploading them (without having to reupload), but idk the extent to how much you can edit though (or if everyone has that luxury).
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 12:06 am
by idkm8
sinnamonrollphil wrote:slytherina wrote:Sorry this is
off topic but I just noticed something (that some of you may or may not have been aware of before me
you probably already know and have discussed so sorry in advance)
So I've been doing some sketching and doodling tonight and put on some of D&Ps videos on in the background. Cringe Attack came on, and because I was sort of distracted and not really watching that closely, at the 'stealing the pokemon card' sketch of the video, I heard the route 1 music from the games in the background, which in itself I don't remember being in the video before. So I looked up and the whole scene was greyscale with a sort of blur effect around the edges. And i swear for the life of me I don't remember it being like that before? I thought it was full colour?
I mean there are memes taken from that point in the video which are in colour -
And this is how the same part looked when I just watched it -
Nothing very groundbreaking (sorry to disappoint) but it just got me wondering:
a) at what point did Dan make this edit?
b)It must have been at least a year after he posted it to make the change, given that I've watched this video a few times over the years since its upload - so why would Dan suddenly change an old video? Maybe he was just bored and had an idea but if this has been discussed before can someone please enlighten me?
Sorry, can you tell I'm bored tonight?
Okay so my roommate came in and showed me this without telling me and i IMMEDIATELY was like THIS IS WRONG. so i did some digging and i went all the way back through dailyphan's 2013 archive and the stuff they reblogged back then was ALSO grey scale
and im sorry but this is a mandella effect because it WAS NOT ALWAYS LIKE THIS.
im pretty certain it's always been grey as dan is originally wearing a yellow shirt in this clip and had it of ever of been in colour i would
know about it
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 12:15 am
by sweetmm
i remembered it in grey-scale, thinking is he trying to hide he is wearing Phil's clothes.
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 12:39 am
by shoe
Ten Eighty article about the ytr tatinof teaser doesn't really say much.
http://teneightymagazine.com/2016/09/22 ... inof-film/
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 12:48 am
by Galactic-Howell
akui wrote:I'm super bored, so while i was taking some personality test, i started to wonder what deppy's personalities are out of the 16 types.
See 16 types here.
https://www.16personalities.com/personality-types
To me Dan seems like a INTJ, the “ARCHITECT”. Imaginative and strategic thinkers, with a plan for everything.
And Phil is INFJ, the “ADVOCATE”. Quiet and mystical, yet very inspiring and tireless idealists.
What do you guys think? (also what's your type?)
Edit: on a second thought, they could be more perceiving than judging, which make them the logician and the mediator
I am Protagonist (ENFJ-T)
I agree with what you would assume to be! It would be neat if they took it!
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 2:00 am
by pewphan
Galactic-Howell wrote:akui wrote:I'm super bored, so while i was taking some personality test, i started to wonder what deppy's personalities are out of the 16 types.
See 16 types here.
https://www.16personalities.com/personality-types
To me Dan seems like a INTJ, the “ARCHITECT”. Imaginative and strategic thinkers, with a plan for everything.
And Phil is INFJ, the “ADVOCATE”. Quiet and mystical, yet very inspiring and tireless idealists.
What do you guys think? (also what's your type?)
Edit: on a second thought, they could be more perceiving than judging, which make them the logician and the mediator
I am Protagonist (ENFJ-T)
I agree with what you would assume to be! It would be neat if they took it!
Dan mentioned in some liveshows that he's an INFJ, but he said it changes.
I took that quiz a few times and I always get INTJ.
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 2:07 am
by mysterylovescompany
akui wrote:I'm super bored, so while i was taking some personality test, i started to wonder what deppy's personalities are out of the 16 types.
See 16 types here.
https://www.16personalities.com/personality-types
To me Dan seems like a INTJ, the “ARCHITECT”. Imaginative and strategic thinkers, with a plan for everything.
And Phil is INFJ, the “ADVOCATE”. Quiet and mystical, yet very inspiring and tireless idealists.
What do you guys think? (also what's your type?)
Edit: on a second thought, they could be more perceiving than judging, which make them the logician and the mediator
This topic is giving me serious flashbacks to old gg days! I am an INTP, by the way.
I don't put stock in the Mandela effect and I don't recall that that video ever had that part in colour. Maybe you guys just never noticed the pokemon sound (I didn't) and got confused with the video thumbnail?
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 2:21 am
by isabella
mysterylovescompany wrote:
This topic is giving me serious flashbacks to old gg days! I am an INTP, by the way.
I don't put stock in the Mandela effect and I don't recall that that video ever had that part in colour. Maybe you guys just never noticed the pokemon sound (I didn't) and got confused with the video thumbnail?
I'm an INTP too! And yeah I actually studied human memory quite a bit in uni, and I think a lot of "mandela effects" can be explained by the fact that we don't know how bad our memories are lol I'm sure we all just never noticed it until it was pointed out. I just had a nice little wtf moment when it was mentioned haha
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 3:16 am
by RRR98
ESTP for me. lol I had just taken this test too
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 3:35 am
by anathema
akui wrote:I'm super bored, so while i was taking some personality test, i started to wonder what deppy's personalities are out of the 16 types.
See 16 types here.
https://www.16personalities.com/personality-types
To me Dan seems like a INTJ, the “ARCHITECT”. Imaginative and strategic thinkers, with a plan for everything.
And Phil is INFJ, the “ADVOCATE”. Quiet and mystical, yet very inspiring and tireless idealists.
What do you guys think? (also what's your type?)
Edit: on a second thought, they could be more perceiving than judging, which make them the logician and the mediator
I'm an ENTJ-T (AKA I'm super rude lmao).
Does anyone know how compatible D&P's assumed personality types are?
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 3:41 am
by hannah
isabella wrote:mysterylovescompany wrote:
This topic is giving me serious flashbacks to old gg days! I am an INTP, by the way.
I don't put stock in the Mandela effect and I don't recall that that video ever had that part in colour. Maybe you guys just never noticed the pokemon sound (I didn't) and got confused with the video thumbnail?
I'm an INTP too! And yeah I actually studied human memory quite a bit in uni, and I think a lot of "mandela effects" can be explained by the fact that we don't know how bad our memories are lol I'm sure we all just never noticed it until it was pointed out. I just had a nice little wtf moment when it was mentioned haha
I'm an INTP as well! Three percent of the population, huh? I guess we're all hiding out here.
Pretty sure it's a curiousity thing, being way too drawn to conspiracies and feeling that need to express your (flawed) opinions. IDB is right up my ally.
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 5:05 am
by swofro
[offtopic]Just so we don't clog out the thread from being offtopic, here's a
poll for the mbti-s for fun.

[/offtopic]
I remember that Dan saying he is INFJ but I can't remember when he said it's changed, can someone link me? (or was it in the same ls and I just have bad memory?)
Talking about bad memory, I haven't watch Cringe Attack for months / years so I am not sure whether the sketch is black & white or coloured but I agree with whoever said that we might be confused from all the other sketches Dan made. But Mandela effects sounds pretty cool too. Haha.
Moving on, do you guys reckon we will get a joint liveshow soon for the ytred vids launching? Because I am doomed since I will be away to a place with limited internet connection on the last liveshow before 5th of October and the thought of missing a joint liveshow drain my determination.
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 5:06 am
by phannielogic
aside from the promo, subtle phan service, and the dinof/ap masks, i thought it was p good. im p excited for the book!!
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 5:07 am
by phannielogic
(((also im an infp)))
Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 5:13 am
by anathema
phannielogic wrote:aside from the promo, subtle phan service, and the dinof/ap masks, i thought it was p good. im p excited for the book!!
Which video? The DAPGO meme one? Because if that's what you're talking about then did you dislike the whole video?
