Ticia wrote:I'm sorry, but what a bland interview, both from the interviewers and deppy. It brought me back to my pre-teen years, when every teen magazine had Avril Lavigne on the cover and included shocking facts and information like her favourite colour.
I did not expect much more, really, bc Girlfriend magazine is exactly of that calibre (a vapid rag for teenage girls). Robot questions get you robot answers.
Two shows in the next 24 hours and six shows in five consecutive days next week. Glad they're getting the koala-holding times in while they can. Hopefully they'll leave enough energy to enjoy the larger cities as well.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 3:34 pm
by Winston
fancybum wrote:I love Phil, I absolutely love him. And I know that at the end of the day what we're talking about here is a fluff interview to take up space in a meaningless magazine (no offence Magazine). But he uses words as camouflage. He chooses the safest response that people can just skim over as they read. 'Buffy, yes, nothing new there'. Man or woman, surely he has a more recent 'celebrity crush' than a show from almost 15 years ago. He doesn't want to answer the question at all? Then why not come up with a more interesting joke/deflective answer. Have some fun with it. But he doesn't do any of that, because saying anything different runs the risk of making somebody's ears perk up in his general direction. He clings to the status quo so our eyes move along to the next question, our thoughts of him unchanged. Which, whatever, he's living his life. But man, crack a window Phil, let some fresh air in. I don't get what the worst case scenario could possibly be that prevents him from saying something new or unexpected. He doesn't want to see weird new fanart? Isn't he sick of the usual stuff by now? Truly what else is the deterrent? No comprende.
Yes! This is what I thought too. Who is supposed to read/watch these interviews? Anyone who knows deppy, knows these answers. And if they don't know deppy, how is that supposed to make them interested? Buffy? Really? Nothing more current? Or at least more interesting? They need new speech writers, especially Phil. I love him but he seems so...afraid? Unwilling to open up a little bit. Jfc, let the breeze in Phil, it's nice every once in a while....
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 3:38 pm
by alittledizzy
Winston wrote:
fancybum wrote:I love Phil, I absolutely love him. And I know that at the end of the day what we're talking about here is a fluff interview to take up space in a meaningless magazine (no offence Magazine). But he uses words as camouflage. He chooses the safest response that people can just skim over as they read. 'Buffy, yes, nothing new there'. Man or woman, surely he has a more recent 'celebrity crush' than a show from almost 15 years ago. He doesn't want to answer the question at all? Then why not come up with a more interesting joke/deflective answer. Have some fun with it. But he doesn't do any of that, because saying anything different runs the risk of making somebody's ears perk up in his general direction. He clings to the status quo so our eyes move along to the next question, our thoughts of him unchanged. Which, whatever, he's living his life. But man, crack a window Phil, let some fresh air in. I don't get what the worst case scenario could possibly be that prevents him from saying something new or unexpected. He doesn't want to see weird new fanart? Isn't he sick of the usual stuff by now? Truly what else is the deterrent? No comprende.
Yes! This is what I thought too. Who is supposed to read/watch these interviews? Anyone who knows deppy, knows these answers. And if they don't know deppy, how is that supposed to make them interested? Buffy? Really? Nothing more current? Or at least more interesting? They need new speech writers, especially Phil. I love him but he seems so...afraid? Unwilling to open up a little bit. Jfc, let the breeze in Phil, it's nice every once in a while....
First of all: I agree.
But second, I wonder if they're just really not keen on text-only interviews? I wonder if he'd take more of a risk in a spoken word one? They both opened up nicely in that HuffPo one but since Dan used emoticons I am assuming this was a completely text-based interview, and it's hard to take risks when you know people have no base for judging your tone. Text interviews can also be taken way out of context (for publication, not just the way fans do). I'm talking specifically in how both of them played every question safe, not just Phil.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:13 pm
by SquishPhan
I wonder if maybe Phil just doesn't really get celebrity crushes, like Dan does.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:19 pm
by Ticia
How to Avoid Socializing with Youtubers You Dislike: An Extensive Guide by Dan Howell.
Page 1: turn your head to the opposite direction of the camera and be on Tumblr.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:22 pm
by fancybum
SquishPhan wrote:I wonder if maybe Phil just doesn't really get celebrity crushes, like Dan does.
He should have answered Jack and Dean for all three Kiss/Marry/Kill. That's my kind of trolling. Play us all like a fiddle Phil.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:46 pm
by anathema
The article was boring, but I didn't expect anything better. It was kinda funny Dan said he would kill Phil though
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 5:07 pm
by Diyes_Celine
Phil is more open if it's an actual interview (without Dan interrupting him) especially if it's not about him. I remember their interview with Jimmy. He was really talkative and was fun to watch. I really want to learn more about Phil. I really want to hear/to read nonRobot responses. But I always give him a pass (despite my frustration) because the last time we actually heard/watched what he genuinely feel it was through a YT glitch. Scarred 4lyf. Besides, Dan "over shares" for the two of them any way.
Alleluia! Phil changed his twitter icon. PLEASE CHANGE YOUR YOUTUBE AND TUMBLR ICONS! While you're at it, change your youtube banner and Tumblr layout. I volunteer if you want help. Haha
alittledizzy wrote: Cuuuuuuuuuuute. No, gross. No, cute. Cute gross. Cross. Grute.
The eternal struggle.
stella wrote:totally not crying because that's totally not the cutest thing I've ever seen send help
I'm afraid this is the only help available for your particular condition, the InDepthBants Support Group for Mildly Obsessed Dan and Phil Fans.
bluebox-away wrote: Also, adorable koala pictures! Which they definitely paid like $20 each for so not worth it but okay
How can you say that??!1? Have you even seen these pictures??!1!?? + Koala bears is priceless, okay? PRICELESS
Re: magazine
"DAN & PHIL GIVE US THE D.L. ON THE AMAZING TOUR IS NOT ON FIRE TOUR!" = how to journalism*
"What do you find most annoying thing about each other?" = how to english
"This Amazing Book is not on Fire?" = how to english part 2
"The boys will be doing a string of show from August." = how to english part 3
"What was your personal favourite part of This Amazing Book is not on Fire?
D: Probably 'What Happened In Vegas' I'm just so happy that the truth is finally out!"
..............................
"In a game of Kiss, Marry, Kill: YouTuber edition, who would you pick for each?
D: Kiss: the clock from 'Don't Hug Me I'm Scared 2'. Kill: Phil and Marry: PewDiePie."
Yes kill Phil and marry PewDiePie, sounds the right way round to me
Surprised he mentioned Phil at all though for a question like that.
*this joke is the intellectual property of IDB member eevee™, all rights reserved
I'm sorry this whole post is just me being needlessly picky about grammar I just think if you are employed to write an article for an online magazine, and are writing up an interview with two prominent people, you should be competent enough to not be making these kind of errors.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 5:34 pm
by SquishPhan
Diyes_Celine wrote:Alleluia! Phil changed his twitter icon. PLEASE CHANGE YOUR YOUTUBE AND TUMBLR ICONS! While you're at it, change your youtube banner and Tumblr layout. I volunteer if you want help. Haha
Yes to all of this.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:12 pm
by eevee
bluewho wrote:Re: magazine
"DAN & PHIL GIVE US THE D.L. ON THE AMAZING TOUR IS NOT ON FIRE TOUR!" = how to journalism*
"What do you find most annoying thing about each other?" = how to english
"This Amazing Book is not on Fire?" = how to english part 2
"The boys will be doing a string of show from August." = how to english part 3
I was about to say "i had the same thought!" until I saw:
bluewho wrote:*this joke is the intellectual property of IDB member eevee™, all rights reserved
the the tour tour. lol.
Also surprised, shocked, and disappointed that Dan isn't in a giant condom in the koala picture, he let me down. unstan
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:20 pm
by vincentian
blueapple_x wrote:
Re: Phil repeating same things
I feel like he's not lying when he says he's bad at coming up with on-the-spot answers so he repeats things he said before cause it's safer and practical. I think Phil majorly lacks the kind of vanity that motivates you to sound "edgy" and "cool" in interviews (even if it wasn't for a teeny magazine), he just doesn't care. Though he probably did a good job promoting his channel by mentioning the videos he has made. Maybe should get a publicist, it'd make for more exciting interviews and protect them in case of stupid journalists like the one from The Sunday Times. And the picture of they picked is so good! I believe it's from last year from the times of UK tour judging from their looks.
bluebox-away wrote:
Also, adorable koala pictures! Which they definitely paid like $20 each for so not worth it but okay
Matching captions omg they are so married damnit
Eye reflection analysis time: it looks like Phil took the picture of Dan bc of his white t-shirt, but Phil's picture was taken by the koala lol.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:24 pm
by Lucet
vincentian wrote:
Eye reflection analysis time: it looks like Phil took the picture of Dan bc of his white t-shirt, but Phil's picture was taken by the koala lol.
I snorted
They both look very cute with the koalas. Very. Cute.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:55 pm
by majitzu
Hahahhahaha that's definitely a koala in Phil's eyes
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 8:30 pm
by itsonlybeth
bluewho wrote:
Why am I not surprised they were talking about koalas
I thought she meant that they were listening to a talk about koalas from a zookeeper or something but maybe I'm wrong.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 8:37 pm
by Winston
maybe Dan picked up a koala suit while they were there and changed into it after his photo. That's why Phil doesn't look as thrilled in his pic, would rather be holding the giant koala taking his picture instead.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 8:57 pm
by Ticia
Cornelia is the only one I would trust with my baby.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:40 pm
by bee
Ticia wrote:
Cornelia is the only one I would trust with my baby.
totally
Also hi, I'm still lurking but have nothing to add to the discussions. I'm looking forward to the tour documentary which I think/hope will be good.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:42 pm
by alittledizzy
bee wrote:I'm looking forward to the tour documentary which I think/hope will be good.
I was actually wondering earlier how likely it is crew will be featured in the documentary. Did we ever see cameras on the merch team doing their thing, or watching people unload the buses? Or will this be entirely a deppy-centric undertaking.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:55 pm
by LurkingTrash
I'm glad we changed subjects today, I was close to posting about houseplants/cactus only and possibly be banned for spamming
Re: interview:
Diyes_Celine wrote:Phil is more open if it's an actual interview (without Dan interrupting him) especially if it's not about him. I remember their interview with Jimmy. He was really talkative and was fun to watch. I really want to learn more about Phil. I really want to hear/to read nonRobot responses. But I always give him a pass (despite my frustration) because the last time we actually heard/watched what he genuinely feel it was through a YT glitch. Scarred 4lyf. Besides, Dan "over shares" for the two of them any way.
Alleluia! Phil changed his twitter icon. PLEASE CHANGE YOUR YOUTUBE AND TUMBLR ICONS! While you're at it, change your youtube banner and Tumblr layout. I volunteer if you want help. Haha
alittledizzy wrote:
Winston wrote:
fancybum wrote:I love Phil, I absolutely love him. And I know that at the end of the day what we're talking about here is a fluff interview to take up space in a meaningless magazine (no offence Magazine). But he uses words as camouflage. He chooses the safest response that people can just skim over as they read. 'Buffy, yes, nothing new there'. Man or woman, surely he has a more recent 'celebrity crush' than a show from almost 15 years ago. He doesn't want to answer the question at all? Then why not come up with a more interesting joke/deflective answer. Have some fun with it. But he doesn't do any of that, because saying anything different runs the risk of making somebody's ears perk up in his general direction. He clings to the status quo so our eyes move along to the next question, our thoughts of him unchanged. Which, whatever, he's living his life. But man, crack a window Phil, let some fresh air in. I don't get what the worst case scenario could possibly be that prevents him from saying something new or unexpected. He doesn't want to see weird new fanart? Isn't he sick of the usual stuff by now? Truly what else is the deterrent? No comprende.
Yes! This is what I thought too. Who is supposed to read/watch these interviews? Anyone who knows deppy, knows these answers. And if they don't know deppy, how is that supposed to make them interested? Buffy? Really? Nothing more current? Or at least more interesting? They need new speech writers, especially Phil. I love him but he seems so...afraid? Unwilling to open up a little bit. Jfc, let the breeze in Phil, it's nice every once in a while....
First of all: I agree.
But second, I wonder if they're just really not keen on text-only interviews? I wonder if he'd take more of a risk in a spoken word one? They both opened up nicely in that HuffPo one but since Dan used emoticons I am assuming this was a completely text-based interview, and it's hard to take risks when you know people have no base for judging your tone. Text interviews can also be taken way out of context (for publication, not just the way fans do). I'm talking specifically in how both of them played every question safe, not just Phil.
I agree with the quoted above ^^^ and I wanted to add that I feel like it has a lot to do with who he's talking to, you know? Like, Jimmy was friends with him that might put him at ease, a reporter that acts professionally and knowledgeable about them (did his research)
example
and someone that they have interviewed with more than once (like that girl, Tori or something? can't find links sorry, that was a good one, she's good at research too) are among the few interviews that first come to my mind when I think about Phil at ease and speaking more so I think this factor also weights in.
Ticia wrote:
Cornelia is the only one I would trust with my baby.
too real
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:56 pm
by Catallena
Diyes_Celine wrote:
Alleluia! Phil changed his twitter icon. PLEASE CHANGE YOUR YOUTUBE AND TUMBLR ICONS! While you're at it, change your youtube banner and Tumblr layout. I volunteer if you want help. Haha
Don't forget the Twitter header, the chibi and that 'rawr' needs. to. go. NOW.
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:21 pm
by annetamiau
Catallena wrote:
Diyes_Celine wrote:
Alleluia! Phil changed his twitter icon. PLEASE CHANGE YOUR YOUTUBE AND TUMBLR ICONS! While you're at it, change your youtube banner and Tumblr layout. I volunteer if you want help. Haha
Don't forget the Twitter header, the chibi and that 'rawr' needs. to. go. NOW.
aw, I kinda want the 'rawr' to stay (if it takes the back seat). It's been fundamental to phil's branding and his general weirdness. I'm happy his random roaring phase has been over for a while though
Also, cute koala pictures
and re: the documentary, I think it will be 95% deppy-centric with some crew action here and there
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 1:08 am
by kay
Ticia wrote:Cornelia is the only one I would trust with my baby.
Second this, Martyn looks like he's about to drop the poor thing, and D&P are clutching on to them for dear life. Don't break their teeny tiny ribs lest they sink their vampire teeth into you! Wait no these aren't drop bears.
The interview was dry as day old toast but I did like the photo. Is it a new(ly released) one? They look great in it. This answer made me laugh:
What do you find most annoying thing about each other?
P: Dan is way too fussy about mess. If I spill a little bit of milk on his laptop he acts like I've committed a crime!
D: Something about cereal.
Both clearly over the questions and just messing with the writer at this point. "Something about cereal." Even D&P themselves are tired of their own answers.
#crackawindow2017
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 2:26 am
by spaceguitar
I had a weird day where I thought maybe I was over dnp and found that this actually made me really sad. It seems that I'm fairly attached to them (mainly Dan). Then I watched Dans most recent ls and now I'm back.
I agree with whoever said that maybe Phil doesn't really get celeb crushes. I know a lot of people do not. I actually thought that written interview was cute. Lol at Dan killing Phil.
Also on Twitter Dan told someone the reason his hair was straightened in the koala selfie was bc he automatically accidentally straightened his hair. Is this an excuse??? The world may never know
Re: Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 2:34 am
by kay
spaceguitar wrote:I had a weird day where I thought maybe I was over dnp and found that this actually made me really sad. It seems that I'm fairly attached to them (mainly Dan). Then I watched Dans most recent ls and now I'm back.
I agree with whoever said that maybe Phil doesn't really get celeb crushes. I know a lot of people do not. I actually thought that written interview was cute. Lol at Dan killing Phil.
Also on Twitter Dan told someone the reason his hair was straightened in the koala selfie was bc he automatically accidentally straightened his hair. Is this an excuse??? The world may never know
I read this response on twitter and someone being like HOW DOES SOMEONE DO IT ACCIDENTALLY and weirdly(?) I kind of get this. There are things we do in our morning routine every single day that we don't even think about (walk to the bathroom, wash hands and face, take shower, hang the towel in the same place, put in contacts, etc) all mindlessly that if I'm Dan and I've been straightening my hair every day for however many years I might have done the same thing. Although it did excite me to see "I'm seeing if I don't need to do this now" which means hopefully he's considering letting the hobbit hair fly free once and a while.
Robot questions get you robot answers.
Glad they're getting the koala-holding times in while they can. Hopefully they'll leave enough energy to enjoy the larger cities as well. 
