Yeah I have been haha. I can't say I'm surprised. I'm just in an impatient mood I guess!Philena wrote: Haven't you been in the phandom a long time? Ambiguity is the name of the game![]()
Dan & Phil Part 22: #rubberupfordan

Phil looks like he went to sleep at 6 AM and is dying inside, Dan glows like he spent the night having orgasms - Ticia
-
- flower crown
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:57 pm
They may stay a few days but I don't think they'll stay too long. I don't think we'll get a ls on the 30th but it'd be nice!fancybum wrote:Oh wow there's only 3 shows left? 3 days and tatinof is over (hopefully almost entirely)! Do you think they'll hang out in Australia for a while like they did in the US or will they be back in the UK by the weekend? Would hoping for a liveshow on the 30th be overly optimistic..? I'd like Dan to shut down anything he needs to shut down and also talk about koalas pls/thx.
There's only three shows left and deppy have made no indication of a European/Asia Tour? Should we be worriedfancybum wrote:Oh wow there's only 3 shows left? 3 days and tatinof is over (hopefully almost entirely)! Do you think they'll hang out in Australia for a while like they did in the US or will they be back in the UK by the weekend? Would hoping for a liveshow on the 30th be overly optimistic..? I'd like Dan to shut down anything he needs to shut down and also talk about koalas pls/thx.
Have any detectives found any soon to be shows on any Ticket Website?

-
- lady door
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 5:02 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: Bavaria
I think the nailpolish suits him and i also think it's not that big of a deal to him. I actually think the phandom preassure on this would have died down if he had very clearly said that he doesn't want to. Instead he's always just named superficial reasons why he can't be bothered, like not having nail polish remover.
Or he actually really wanted to try it, then good for him.
Maybe he's secretly thankful the phandom is giving him an "excuse" to try it, so he can say he did it for us. Not that wearing nail polish is a big thing, but some self-conscious people can get weird about the smallest things.
He's wearing all the ugly unconventional yeezy stuff though, so he probs doesn't care and i'm projecting.
Or he actually really wanted to try it, then good for him.
Maybe he's secretly thankful the phandom is giving him an "excuse" to try it, so he can say he did it for us. Not that wearing nail polish is a big thing, but some self-conscious people can get weird about the smallest things.
He's wearing all the ugly unconventional yeezy stuff though, so he probs doesn't care and i'm projecting.
anathema wrote:
-
- truth bomb
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 12:27 am
When is the appropriate time to use ?
I hate Dan for painting his nails. It doesn't matter if he was pressured, was trolling or was really interested at it. People in Tumblr won't stop posting about how "blessed" they were because of this. I will never get their fascination so I will not comment on it. But they are tagging those posts and fan arts under "amazingphil" as well. I can't find a decent gif/fan art of the DITL without seeing the spam of nail polish posts. Ugh.
Can he just post the picture and get over it? But of course he wouldn't. Ugh. This guy.
Nail polish doesn't mean anything. I'll be more inclined to discuss his tweet about Frank Ocean's album. Not because of Frank's sexuality but because I like his music more than Kanye. Please replace Kanye with Frank Ocean, Dan.
I hate Dan for painting his nails. It doesn't matter if he was pressured, was trolling or was really interested at it. People in Tumblr won't stop posting about how "blessed" they were because of this. I will never get their fascination so I will not comment on it. But they are tagging those posts and fan arts under "amazingphil" as well. I can't find a decent gif/fan art of the DITL without seeing the spam of nail polish posts. Ugh.
Can he just post the picture and get over it? But of course he wouldn't. Ugh. This guy.
Nail polish doesn't mean anything. I'll be more inclined to discuss his tweet about Frank Ocean's album. Not because of Frank's sexuality but because I like his music more than Kanye. Please replace Kanye with Frank Ocean, Dan.
- confusedpanda
- ar·tic·u·late
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:20 pm
- Pronouns: Her/she
- Location: Somewhere in the USA
Since when did painting nails have to do with sexuality?? And the whole Frank Ocean tweet was to be relatable about listening to a good album, which was pretty obvious, honestly. So how do those things have to do with Dan "suddenly headed into farther into non-straight territory"?? He's becoming comfortable with saying and doing certain things that he wouldn't have in years past, yes. That could be because of personal confidence or whatever. But it doesn't necessarily have to do with him coming out as some sexuality. He's already started he didn't wanna label anything as well. With that, he technically is already out as not straight and has been for months if not a year by now. It didnt cause Phil's walls to toppling about his sexuality just because Dan is out as not straight. No one is pressuring Phil to come out or asking about his sexuality. Most people probably never will since people seem to respect Phil's privacy and personal life way more than they do about Dan. Also I'm still failing to see how having a separate room is a denial. With that logic, Phan would've been denied and disproven completely when they moved into both flats with two bedrooms.Winston wrote:With all the changes I was thinking maybe there was an element of troll happening, just wanted to watch everyone loose their shit, for the lolz…. But I think maybe there is a plan.
Could the obvious (push) to show two rooms/we are not together also coincide with Dan’s all of a sudden heading farther into non-straight territory? I don't know if I am explaining well, but the “phan denialy” way that the DITL started the day before Dan all of a sudden goes all out? This way Dan could come out (in a sense) and not bring Phil’s walls toppling too. WE are not together, Dan is not straight, Phil is still unknown…But of course it really could be for the lolz all along…. .
I don't know if this post makes sense, but it's the best I could express.
We're here, we're queer, we're filled with existential fear!

gif cred: pseudophan on tumblr

gif cred: pseudophan on tumblr
- SquishPhan
- capita£ester
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:18 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: The Netherlands
Yes to this whole post. Thought I don't hate Dan for painting his nailsDiyes_Celine wrote:When is the appropriate time to use ?
I hate Dan for painting his nails. It doesn't matter if he was pressured, was trolling or was really interested at it. People in Tumblr won't stop posting about how "blessed" they were because of this. I will never get their fascination so I will not comment on it. But they are tagging those posts and fan arts under "amazingphil" as well. I can't find a decent gif/fan art of the DITL without seeing the spam of nail polish posts. Ugh.
Can he just post the picture and get over it? But of course he wouldn't. Ugh. This guy.
Nail polish doesn't mean anything. I'll be more inclined to discuss his tweet about Frank Ocean's album. Not because of Frank's sexuality but because I like his music more than Kanye. Please replace Kanye with Frank Ocean, Dan.
I had the same thought! Build enough support for plausible deniability, because sexuality and the true nature of their relationship are so closely linked.Winston wrote:Could the obvious (push) to show two rooms/we are not together also coincide with Dan’s all of a sudden heading farther into non-straight territory? I don't know if I am explaining well, but the “phan denialy” way that the DITL started the day before Dan all of a sudden goes all out? This way Dan could come out (in a sense) and not bring Phil’s walls toppling too. WE are not together, Dan is not straight, Phil is still unknown…But of course it really could be for the lolz all along…. .
Whereas Phil has never really offered any real glimpses into his closet (and frankly, short of being outed somehow, probably has no intention to), Dan has been slowly but steadily cracking open the door of his closet and letting everything spill out: Evan P., #Dick, abs and angst, furry, etc---painted nails is just another in the long list of identity fluid breadcrumbs that he's dropped.
My feeling is Dan will come out in his own way with some diatribe about his distaste for labels and society's need to fit everyone in a box, but leave Phil squarely out of it (or try to).
- alittledizzy
- actual demon phannie
- Posts: 7106
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 3:09 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
I generally agree with the point you're making but I do think Phil has offered some glimpses into his closet. On top of responding to formspring asks about being bisexual (and never taking it back - no 'formspring is full of lies' from Phil, that was all Dan) he does mention attraction to men now and then. They're just more subtle and therefore more easily dismissed/forgotten. I mean, Zayn is basically Phil's equivalent of Evan P. He called Zayn tasty in the Agario video, waffled on in a livestream about Zayn being attractive for like thirty seconds in one go, and had a sticker of Zayn on his laptop.Phantasy wrote:Whereas Phil has never really offered any real glimpses into his closet (and frankly, short of being outed somehow, probably has no intention to), Dan has been slowly but steadily cracking open the door of his closet and letting everything spill out: Evan P., #Dick, abs and angst, furry, etc---painted nails is just another in the long list of identity fluid breadcrumbs that he's dropped.
To me the difference is just that Dan has decided he wants his sexuality to be part of his public identity, and Phil hasn't. That's respectable to me, and in that regard I agree that it's hard for me to imagine Phil ever publicly addressing his sexuality in a way that's designed to draw attention to it as part of his brand.
- coffeepenguin
- rainbow nerd
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:27 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: France
ok, as everyone still seems so agitated by the whole nails thing, I'll leave my two cents, too, even if I said I wouldn't. I'll be the first one to fight gender roles but let's be real, we still live in a mostly heteronormative society. So I feel like there is a big difference between men seen as effeminate (and gay and bisexual men are inherently seen as effeminate by the society, even if it's wrong, and the binary system is wrong in itself, yadda yadda) painting their nails and other men doing it. There is also a difference between men seen as effeminate and comfortable with it and those not. Like, a guy like Felix could paint his nails and it will be just seen as a sign of him being "comfortable with his gender identity/sexuality", "being progressive" and all that, it will be cool. A guy like Tyler (don't follow him much, correct me if I'm wrong) could paint his nails because he's gay and out, all his "professional fangirl" stance, it'll be written off as a "gay thing". Or someone deliberately playing with/subversing gender roles and being public about it could paint their nails and it will have nothing to do with their sexuality, because it will be a public statement on gender in society and acceptable behaviour.
However, Dan Howell, unfortunately, isn't like any of the cases above. Here's someone who, I'm sorry, has started professionally by being sexually inappropriate on the Internet for attention and continued to do so even while brushing off some of his younger self's actions as being for attention
(I HATED the sexy endscreen dance, I've never been more glad to see something go from both of their channels) and basically made everything about himself about his sexuality, too (not just his sexual orientation, but in a broader sense), there are just too many examples. So yeah, now he can't escape questions about it when he's painting his nails, because, as I was saying about fanservice, it's the intent that matters. What is his intent, then? Frank Ocean, probably.
Now, Phil is completely different, because even in his "wilder" years he's never been, like, physical in expressing his sexuality as it was (see for comparison: the sexy endscreen dance vs. draw Phil naked). Basically, this:
However, Dan Howell, unfortunately, isn't like any of the cases above. Here's someone who, I'm sorry, has started professionally by being sexually inappropriate on the Internet for attention and continued to do so even while brushing off some of his younger self's actions as being for attention

Now, Phil is completely different, because even in his "wilder" years he's never been, like, physical in expressing his sexuality as it was (see for comparison: the sexy endscreen dance vs. draw Phil naked). Basically, this:
alittledizzy wrote:To me the difference is just that Dan has decided he wants his sexuality to be part of his public identity, and Phil hasn't. That's respectable to me, and in that regard I agree that it's hard for me to imagine Phil ever publicly addressing his sexuality in a way that's designed to draw attention to it as part of his brand.
Dan wants to be understood. Phil just wants to make the viewer smile and sell some backpacks (c) fancybum
-
- living flop
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:13 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
wow, just caught up on the last few pages.
as usual I don't have anything interesting or insightful to add but I would just like to say that 2016 is turning out to be a v intriguing and exciting year to be a fan of deppy.
dan in particular seems to be becoming much more accepting of himself and is so much more open to change.
I hope one day phil becomes comfortable enough to share more with his audience.
the future looks very bright though and I'm so happy if this means dan is becoming happier in himself
as usual I don't have anything interesting or insightful to add but I would just like to say that 2016 is turning out to be a v intriguing and exciting year to be a fan of deppy.
dan in particular seems to be becoming much more accepting of himself and is so much more open to change.
I hope one day phil becomes comfortable enough to share more with his audience.
the future looks very bright though and I'm so happy if this means dan is becoming happier in himself
"don't mind me, just having a little float" - dan howell
I think you kind of missed what I was saying. I agree nails being painted is a dead issue for sexuality. I mean men have been painting them for years...I mean ozzy Osborne and Alice Cooper. Seriously I never understood the fascination with Dan painting his.confusedpanda wrote:Since when did painting nails have to do with sexuality?? And the whole Frank Ocean tweet was to be relatable about listening to a good album, which was pretty obvious, honestly. So how do those things have to do with Dan "suddenly headed into farther into non-straight territory"?? He's becoming comfortable with saying and doing certain things that he wouldn't have in years past, yes. That could be because of personal confidence or whatever. But it doesn't necessarily have to do with him coming out as some sexuality. He's already started he didn't wanna label anything as well. With that, he technically is already out as not straight and has been for months if not a year by now. It didnt cause Phil's walls to toppling about his sexuality just because Dan is out as not straight. No one is pressuring Phil to come out or asking about his sexuality. Most people probably never will since people seem to respect Phil's privacy and personal life way more than they do about Dan. Also I'm still failing to see how having a separate room is a denial. With that logic, Phan would've been denied and disproven completely when they moved into both flats with two bedrooms.Winston wrote:With all the changes I was thinking maybe there was an element of troll happening, just wanted to watch everyone loose their shit, for the lolz…. But I think maybe there is a plan.
Could the obvious (push) to show two rooms/we are not together also coincide with Dan’s all of a sudden heading farther into non-straight territory? I don't know if I am explaining well, but the “phan denialy” way that the DITL started the day before Dan all of a sudden goes all out? This way Dan could come out (in a sense) and not bring Phil’s walls toppling too. WE are not together, Dan is not straight, Phil is still unknown…But of course it really could be for the lolz all along…. .
I don't know if this post makes sense, but it's the best I could express.
I was talking about him just being more and more comfortable in himself. Wearing that tunicy-dress thing, letting his hair down so to speak, and the comments concerning his sexuality etc. The not sharing a room thing also means nothing, it was the obvious way they set it up. To make sure we all knew they were not sharing. And that was all Phil as it was on his channel. I mean Dan played along and hey they had separate rooms so what. But it just was so forced it seemed to me a lot of others to show that. Keeping Phil safety where he always was... but Dan's actions as of late show he isn't where he was in the past. If Phil wants to stay in the closet or if he isn't even in a closet they want to make sure Dan's actions don't drag Phil along in his wake of happy self acceptance. I don't believe that if Dan came out tomorrow wrapped up on a rainbow flag or whatever flag he wants to fly that then means they are in a relationship and phil is in fact his honey bear, but a hell of a lot of people would think that. I still don't know if this is making my point or just confusing things more.
actions speak louder than words
How did Dan make everything about himself about his sexuality?? I completely disagree with that.coffeepenguin wrote:
However, Dan Howell, unfortunately, isn't like any of the cases above. Here's someone who, I'm sorry, has started professionally by being sexually inappropriate on the Internet for attention and continued to do so even while brushing off some of his younger self's actions as being for attention(I HATED the sexy endscreen dance, I've never been more glad to see something go from both of their channels) and basically made everything about himself about his sexuality, too (not just his sexual orientation, but in a broader sense), there are just too many examples. So yeah, now he can't escape questions about it when he's painting his nails, because, as I was saying about fanservice, it's the intent that matters. What is his intent, then? Frank Ocean, probably.
And if I can agree he was mildly sexually inappropriate for attention while starting out (and mainly on dailybooth not really on youtube), I never thought of the sexy end screen dance as sexually inappropriate? or even as sexual at all tbh.
If you’re attracted to somebody, you’ll want them to sniff you eventually - Dan
*Phil is turned on by Dan's brilliance* *they kiss* *they have sex in the microwave* - Oqua (actually Phil)
*Phil is turned on by Dan's brilliance* *they kiss* *they have sex in the microwave* - Oqua (actually Phil)
Yes it's only nails, but it's also not. Dan is in the public eye, if Dan paints his nails, in some small way, it sends the message that it's normal to break gender norms - or at the very least to experiment with them. The fact that so many people here seem to see it as not an example of breaking gender norms is a good sign. It's a sign that it's becoming normalized, that society is changing, it fills me with hope.coffeepenguin wrote: in the end, it's such a trivial matter, like, it's only nails?
For example, if a man had painted his nails in the 1950s, do you think many people would be saying 'that's not breaking gender norms'. The fact that this is being said is a sign of progress. Progress which has been hard won by little small acts like this - by women deciding they can wear trousers, by guys deciding they can wear earrings, and yes, by guys in the public eye showing that it's acceptable and even 'cool' to paint your nails. This is even more important for guys, who still face ridicule if they leave the house in a dress, as opposed to women who have won the ability to leave the house dressed tomboy and face less ridicule.
Maybe I am being dramatic about a small and seemingly insignificant thing, but if you see it as a small act in a chain of small acts which is revolutionizing the way we see gender - maybe you will understand where I am coming from. I look forward to the day when it's not noteworthy that Dan wore nail polish, or yes high heels, because that will be the day this gender norm crap has been truly put to bed.
confusedpanda wrote: Have you seen his @ mentions today or the trending topics? It's all about keeping his nails painted and demanding the photo he said he'd post of them. It's just like with his natural hair.
In Dan's defense, he did start growing out his nails sometime before leaving for aus, which makes me wonder if he planned to do it there in the first place. He could've painted them regardless of nail length and people would've flipped out. But yet he chose to grow his nails out. So is it really to give the fans what they wanted in that case? Or was it just to try something new out for himself?
fancybumfancybum wrote:What about on women with large hands? What 90s television might call.. "man hands"? Is it a good look for men with small feminine hands? It's a strange thought that coloured nails could look better or worse depending on a persons gender. Is it a size thing? I don't really get it.uglyamerican wrote:Personally, I don't think it's a good look on men
Sorry for this post I speak to you from beyond the grave Viva la revolution etc, later comrades.
-
- phillion/danosaur <//3
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:35 pm
I know that everyone's pretty much moved on from the DITL but someone pointed out the fact that Dan changed his shirt in the bathroom and I find that so weird? It's completely normal for friends to see each other naked (and he would only be shirtless) and the fact they included that makes me think that they don't really know what is normal for friends to do.
late to the party but idc because my day is shit and my cat is dying who cares what these two assholes get up to.
Oh yay Dan painted his nails now the phandom is never gonna shut up about how Dan is abolishing gender roles by doing essentially nothing.
Fuck off. Bye. I'm done.
Oh yay Dan painted his nails now the phandom is never gonna shut up about how Dan is abolishing gender roles by doing essentially nothing.
Fuck off. Bye. I'm done.
jaej wrote:literally miss me with that praise of him ~ignoring gender norms~ when he is doing it for 15 year old girls who want it because they find it visually appealing.
- LurkingTrash
- woodland creature
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2016 3:09 am
- Pronouns: She/Her
didn't caught up with everything yet but only wanted to answer:hunnyftw wrote:I interpret it as that plus as Dan genuinely fangirling over this guy and love it as well. Yasss, Dan.majitzu wrote:I feel that tweet is like a leave me alone, I won't tell ypu anything and I kind of love it.
But at the same time no LurkingTrash , it doesn't feel BIG to me. Not at all. Could you maybe explain what you mean by it? Why is it big for you?
ehh sorry,

I actually feel a lot like you guys said about it now.
-
- procrastinator
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:01 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
jaej wrote:literally miss me with that praise of him ~ignoring gender norms~ when he is doing it for 15 year old girls who want it because they find it visually appealing.
I think he took his jumper off while he was in the room with Phil and went into the bathroom to 'change' [read as: walk into the bathroom to walk straight out again] because you can see his bare arm when he reaches for it off the bed at 18:04 and he'd just been in a long-sleeved jumper with nothing underneath as we could clearly tell from him rolling around on the floor shortly before.rhythmicsummer wrote:I know that everyone's pretty much moved on from the DITL but someone pointed out the fact that Dan changed his shirt in the bathroom and I find that so weird? It's completely normal for friends to see each other naked (and he would only be shirtless) and the fact they included that makes me think that they don't really know what is normal for friends to do.
No, I didn't watch at 0.5 to check on that, I just happened to notice idk cos I'm a fan of his hand/wrist situation choke me daddy...I'm joking
I wonder how biology can explain the physical pain you feel in your chest when all you want to do is talk shit on IDB
ha they probably have no idearhythmicsummer wrote:I know that everyone's pretty much moved on from the DITL but someone pointed out the fact that Dan changed his shirt in the bathroom and I find that so weird? It's completely normal for friends to see each other naked (and he would only be shirtless) and the fact they included that makes me think that they don't really know what is normal for friends to do.

This is an amazingly good catch and it gives me feels, thank you so much Lurktacularr for mentioning thisLurktacularr wrote:I think he took his jumper off while he was in the room with Phil and went into the bathroom to 'change' [read as: walk into the bathroom to walk straight out again] because you can see his bare arm when he reaches for it off the bed at 18:04 and he'd just been in a long-sleeved jumper with nothing underneath as we could clearly tell from him rolling around on the floor shortly before.
Someone (can't remember who sorry) here said that Dan and Phil stage pretty much everything that happens in a DITL but this really makes me think that they didn't think about the arm thing before posting it, didn't think about Ticia's contact solution, etc. Or maybe they want to give us just enough to fuel the fire in our phan hearts either way I don't think it's all staged and I do think this was a tiny slip up. But then again, yes men get shirtless in front of each other all the time, that's fine, that's normal, but what makes me think of it as a slip up is that they were clearly trying to show us that Dan didn't get shirtless in front of Phil, and ended up failing at that when we noticed the arm thing. That's all.

Phil looks like he went to sleep at 6 AM and is dying inside, Dan glows like he spent the night having orgasms - Ticia
I have to agree that it's a little bit weird for friends, specially flatmates of 7 years, to change clothes in the bathroom away from the other
Didn't think at all about this, brownie points for catching this! lol I have to face-palm at this moment
But are you sure Dan is shirtless when he grabs for the t-shirt tho? It could be that he just have pulled his sleeves up?



But are you sure Dan is shirtless when he grabs for the t-shirt tho? It could be that he just have pulled his sleeves up?
- coffeepenguin
- rainbow nerd
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:27 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: France
ok, I think I didn't word it well, but I'm looking at the (public) videos on his main channel now, and aside from being generally awkward the only thing he's made references to in his videos is kinda sex and especially sex on the Internet? that's why I used the term "sexuality" in a broader sense. It's like he's perfectly summing up his character in the video with Louise, "awkward sexually ambiguous nerd". For example, during his first years, there were the truth or dare series and amazing dan (especially in the first one Phil saying that Dan's fans are rude and Dan answering that they're the same fans, only allowing themselves to express it on his channel), general casual rape jokes (starting with the how-to-befriend-your-favorite-internet-stars skit, thankfully, those are long dead), inappropriate winking, then, finally, several videos about fandom culture and shipping. Later, and still, we have more of a running commentary about the Internet generally being for porn and his subscribers wanting him to do sexual poses and stuff, which is also a part of the joint gaming channel. I know a lot of it is sarcasm (and the sexy end screen dance is probably mostly that, but the bit with Louise again is telling, when he's, like, it seems wrong when a girl does it), but what other topics do his videos have? but I was wrong to use "his" for sexuality, although he's exploited it in the beginning, too (here I'm taking into account the dailybooth, you're right)daphenaxa wrote:How did Dan make everything about himself about his sexuality?? I completely disagree with that.
And if I can agree he was mildly sexually inappropriate for attention while starting out (and mainly on dailybooth not really on youtube), I never thought of the sexy end screen dance as sexually inappropriate? or even as sexual at all tbh.
what did you think about the sexy end screen dance, by the way, I'm genuinely interested?
Dan wants to be understood. Phil just wants to make the viewer smile and sell some backpacks (c) fancybum
-
- procrastinator
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:01 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
I mean yeah he could have, I thought this too. But then I thought 'what's the more likely scenario for someone who's about to change shirts: having a bare arm cos they've taken the first off already, or because they've rolled their sleeve up since the last shot' and went with the former. You'll also note there are no shots of Dan in the souvenir-haul section until he's put that t-shirt on. Of course, as always, this stuff isn't hard-and-fast factual, just speculation.taetaewl wrote:I have to agree that it's a little bit weird for friends, specially flatmates of 7 years, to change clothes in the bathroom away from the other![]()
Didn't think at all about this, brownie points for catching this! lol I have to face-palm at this moment
![]()
But are you sure Dan is shirtless when he grabs for the t-shirt tho? It could be that he just have pulled his sleeves up?
I'd like to reiterate the point to anyone who might misinterpret this: I am not suggesting him being topless in front of Phil means anything. I'll quite happily change in front of my flatmate and we've only been living together for 6 months. Their insistence on portraying this somewhat unrealistic veil of modesty is what is more interesting, but even that is nothing new.
Until someone explicitly mentioned it I didn't post it because I know some people will eye roll this discussion so I just wanted to point that out.
I wonder how biology can explain the physical pain you feel in your chest when all you want to do is talk shit on IDB
If Dan just changed shirts, I would expect he went into the bathroom to rearrange his hair in the mirror before being on camera again, rather than hiding out of modesty. The "we change in private" implication may have been a side effect, or a bonus.
That's my socializing quota for the month up.
Wait, when did this happen? The only thing that comes to mind is the diss track thing, but obviously that wasn't a year ago. (Besides the fact it's not actually proof he doesn't want people labeling him.)confusedpanda wrote:He's already started he didn't wanna label anything as well. With that, he technically is already out as not straight and has been for months if not a year by now.