
You could tell that Dan is good at it this game, Phil a bit less, but he did make a strong comeback.
I want them to do another one of these but then when they have their no hitting each other pact.
D&P moving to London was entirely based on the hopes of getting that radio gig so they really did need it in the beginning but Radio 1 has a lot of gay DJ's like Scott Mills, Grimmy and Aled so their sexualities probably wouldn't have been an issue with them (though that doesn't mean that D&P couldn't have felt the need to hide it). They could've felt restricted in terms of creativity and stuff, but I do think the BBC gave them an awful lot of freedom for two complete rookies who barely knew how to work the panel in their first show. imo I don't think D&P were unhappy with what they were doing at the BBC, I think they were unhappy with how it prevented them from doing anything else because it took up so much time. Cutting back on air time allowed them to start a gaming channel and write a book while quitting made it possible to go on tour. Now they fly to Australia for a con and decide to holiday it up in Singapore or they stay in Florida with Phil's family for two weeks. They couldn't have done that with the radio show still going, so really the noticeable change in behavior is probably them being happy they have their freedom back after having been taken up by the BBC, the books and tour for so long.onetruetrash wrote:I was talking about how Dan was hiding his sexuality in 2012 a while ago and I think someone brought up how Dan and Phil were not financially stable and how they kinda needed the job at BBC and Dan and Phil might have thought that they needed to hide their sexualities, Dan especially, in order to make sure they got the job. Is there any reason to believe the BBC would be less likely to hire them if they had been more open about their sexualities, at least back in 2012? I'm American, so I don't know anything about the BBC, but is there any reason to believe that the BBC would make Dan and Phil feel restricted, not even necessarily about their sexualities, but anything in general? i dont think any of this made sense
Thanks for the information about the gay DJs. I'm glad they stopped doing the radio show because we'd miss out on so much otherwise.Catallena wrote:D&P moving to London was entirely based on the hopes of getting that radio gig so they really did need it in the beginning but Radio 1 has a lot of gay DJ's like Scott Mills, Grimmy and Aled so their sexualities probably wouldn't have been an issue with them (though that doesn't mean that D&P couldn't have felt the need to hide it). They could've felt restricted in terms of creativity and stuff, but I do think the BBC gave them an awful lot of freedom for two complete rookies who barely knew how to work the panel in their first show. imo I don't think D&P were unhappy with what they were doing at the BBC, I think they were unhappy with how it prevented them from doing anything else because it took up so much time. Cutting back on air time allowed them to start a gaming channel and write a book while quitting made it possible to go on tour. Now they fly to Australia for a con and decide to holiday it up in Singapore or they stay in Florida with Phil's family for two weeks. They couldn't have done that with the radio show still going, so really the noticeable change in behavior is probably them being happy they have their freedom back after having been taken up by the BBC, the books and tour for so long.onetruetrash wrote:I was talking about how Dan was hiding his sexuality in 2012 a while ago and I think someone brought up how Dan and Phil were not financially stable and how they kinda needed the job at BBC and Dan and Phil might have thought that they needed to hide their sexualities, Dan especially, in order to make sure they got the job. Is there any reason to believe the BBC would be less likely to hire them if they had been more open about their sexualities, at least back in 2012? I'm American, so I don't know anything about the BBC, but is there any reason to believe that the BBC would make Dan and Phil feel restricted, not even necessarily about their sexualities, but anything in general? i dont think any of this made sense
This was so freaking good. Best collab yet. Deppy plus a puppy is just so cute.malday wrote:
oh my god i wasn't ready!!! the amount of GOOD content this week is too much, i'm so happy, this was the cutest videomalday wrote:
Phil Lester wrote:"I'll rub myself in a mango before I eat a mango."