Dan & Phil Part 23: Let's just retract the fist.

Our two favourite full time internet nerds who never go outside!
Locked
User avatar
SquishPhan
capita£ester
Posts: 2502
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:18 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: The Netherlands

phamnotof wrote:
Damn. Recommend giving this a watch with Deppy (well, Dan, I guess, moreso) in mind. Everyone will have to get themselves a kid-friendly persona or else the money might stop raining, I guess, though D&P are both lucky to not rely on per view money anymore.

(I suppose this goes to show why most people who don't make it go on to solo, outside the YT space projects, too, cause YouTube can change on you overnight & you'd be screwed if you didn't have a system in place to sustain your livestyle.)
Wow, this if f'ed up. Dan better watch out.
And this is also way I can't blame any youtubers whose youtube channel is not their priority anymore. Things can change just like that, so I don't blame people for wanting to branch out.
Lurktacularr wrote: This is why I think they never went through much of a rough patch behind closed doors, just shakey on-camera. Because this kind of second-nature handsiness is something we've been seeing more and more of over the last year, which leads me to believe its been there all along and they're just happy for some of it to show these days
Agreed.
User avatar
LurkingTrash
woodland creature
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri May 13, 2016 3:09 am
Pronouns: She/Her

Lurktacularr wrote:
Ticia wrote:
cupcakeman wrote:Hi! Long time lurker, first time poster here!
This is off-topic from the current discussion I guess, but I've just stumbled across a clip from a video which features deppy: [Youtube] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxHe5f6r ... be&t=8m22s [/Youtube] , start from 8:20, that I haven't seen before. I've always had the suspiscion that deppy (in particular Dan) are quite handsy with each other, and this clip does show case that to some degree, Dan's grab of Phil's arm to move him, and then the (reassuring) pat on his shoulder etc etc. I don't know what's happening in the video, looks like they're discussing something and then continue talking to a girl? I don't know, I just see Alfie standing at the sidelines looking worried and Anthony looking bored, haha! And I think it's that night when deppy are helping Anthony back to his hotel room because he's too drunk to walk (if you know what I'm talking about), because they look to be wearing the same clothing as in the pic.

But yeah.. Don't really know what I wanted to say with this post, just thought I would share this clip because I'd like to hear your thoughts on it (if it's even worth reacting to X) ).
I fixed the link for you :platonic:



I haven't seen this video before either, thanks for sharing! I believe those girls are Louise and Cat. It's nice and to be honest kind of unexpected to see Dan being that touchy-feely
I too have never seen this before so thanks! Having watched that bit on repeat like 10 times it seems to me like Dan's trying to drag Phil to his side (his left side) then Phil doesn't wanna be rude to mysteryblonde and goes to his right, and when he does Dan looks suspiciously like he's starting to put his arm around him. Not a big deal for 99.999999% of the population but cute for them, especially at that time

This is why I think they never went through much of a rough patch behind closed doors, just shakey on-camera. Because this kind of second-nature handsiness is something we've been seeing more and more of over the last year, which leads me to believe its been there all along and they're just happy for some of it to show these days
I've seen it before in gifs but I always thought it was just Dan trying to position Phil to take a photo with a fan? Unless that's another youtuber I don't recognize.
Feels more rough than touchy-feely to me but that could be me projecting knowing what year it was and thinking they wouldn't act like that in a room full of vloggers. That's not Cat or Louise tho, does anyone recognize them?
(sorry to be a downer)
User avatar
bluebox-away
woodland creature
Posts: 588
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:28 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: London, England

For those (myself included) who were grumbling about Phil not interacting enough on twitter, he actually did some proper replying tonight! Standard, robotic, jetlag-travel-no-food tweet, but look, actual replies and only 1 emoji!
06/04/2016 - I found The Weakest Link :ninja:
Image
Gif credit: IckleMissMayhem
User avatar
Philena
blobfish
Posts: 673
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 11:52 pm

bluebox-away wrote:For those (myself included) who were grumbling about Phil not interacting enough on twitter, he actually did some proper replying tonight! Standard, robotic, jetlag-travel-no-food tweet, but look, actual replies and only 1 emoji!
Honestly, he has done this a couple of times since concerns were first raised on here. Lurking confirmed
Bassoonage
drama llama
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 4:50 pm

Ok, Ok. I know I don't post often, but I just had to because I want to bring back #nipplegate. So Dan's mentioned on a few occasions that his nipples were showing in white shirts and he puts stuff on over them. He also doesn't show his nipples in videos anymore.

Nipple rings? Just insecure? Constantly hard nipples? Pepperoni nipples? There's something going on there.
Image
bear
hobbit hair
Posts: 254
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 5:41 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: New York, USA

phamnotof wrote:

Damn. Recommend giving this a watch with Deppy (well, Dan, I guess, moreso) in mind. Everyone will have to get themselves a kid-friendly persona or else the money might stop raining, I guess, though D&P are both lucky to not rely on per view money anymore.

(I suppose this goes to show why most people who don't make it go on to solo, outside the YT space projects, too, cause YouTube can change on you overnight & you'd be screwed if you didn't have a system in place to sustain your livestyle.)
Oh god this is gonna change everything. The youtube community, in my opinion, was bad enough. I really, really hope Dan doesn't have to make a kid-friendly persona. That's always been a part of danisnotonfire and I really hope it doesn't have to change.
Bassoonage wrote:Ok, Ok. I know I don't post often, but I just had to because I want to bring back #nipplegate. So Dan's mentioned on a few occasions that his nipples were showing in white shirts and he puts stuff on over them. He also doesn't show his nipples in videos anymore.

Nipple rings? Just insecure? Constantly hard nipples? Pepperoni nipples? There's something going on there.
I know. Since when has he been insecure about them?

1:43 he shows them.
What changed?
anathema
morning quiff
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 10:10 pm
Pronouns: she/her

Ticia wrote:
cupcakeman wrote:Hi! Long time lurker, first time poster here!
This is off-topic from the current discussion I guess, but I've just stumbled across a clip from a video which features deppy: [Youtube] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxHe5f6r ... be&t=8m22s [/Youtube] , start from 8:20, that I haven't seen before. I've always had the suspiscion that deppy (in particular Dan) are quite handsy with each other, and this clip does show case that to some degree, Dan's grab of Phil's arm to move him, and then the (reassuring) pat on his shoulder etc etc. I don't know what's happening in the video, looks like they're discussing something and then continue talking to a girl? I don't know, I just see Alfie standing at the sidelines looking worried and Anthony looking bored, haha! And I think it's that night when deppy are helping Anthony back to his hotel room because he's too drunk to walk (if you know what I'm talking about), because they look to be wearing the same clothing as in the pic.

But yeah.. Don't really know what I wanted to say with this post, just thought I would share this clip because I'd like to hear your thoughts on it (if it's even worth reacting to X) ).
I fixed the link for you :platonic:

I've never seen this before, thanks so much for sharing! Twink centeral, huh I wonder what Dan is doing with his finger right before he grabs Phil? I would love to know what they're saying.

Anyone else here watch Will and RJ? I would honestly love to see them and d&p collab, I think they have a lot of similarities. (Also, their anniversary is October 9th, 2009. I found it funny how close it is to the "phanniversary" :lol: )
User avatar
Catallena
classy cat lady
classy cat lady
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:56 pm
Location: The Netherlands

more clash of opinions under this yay nobody cares :')
phamnotof wrote:
Catallena wrote: The rest of your post was read (and disagreed with) but not really relevant to the response I wanted to make so I deleted it so that the thread wouldn't become the length of the First Testament. It's that specific bit that I wanted to reply to because I see people praising them for doing minimal shit all the time and it annoys me. I'm not gonna get praise for feeding the cats and cleaning out the litter boxes tomorrow at the animal shelter while the rest of the enclosures look like a damn mess, because the bare minimum shouldn't be enough to deserve that. It's where I return to the white male mediocrity mentioned in a previous post, these boys get away with a lot. Like you, I also watch a lot of YT but to me D&P are really nothing special be it creatively or technically.
It's fine you wanted to respond to small part of my post, my issue was that the detail you responded to only made sense in context. I'm sorry nobody says anything nice about you for doing work at the shelter, that definitely is a good thing to do. And I do think that acknowledging everyday boring work that goes into getting shit done has value, I wish people did more of that overall, but that might just be me & how I do the world.

Also, for ther record, again, I never said we should build them a statue for it, I was just illustrating a larger point, that being that I think the overall quality of their content is better than average. And I just really don't think they're mediocre when you compare them to other creators within their genre on YT who need to satisfy an audience as large as theirs.
You misunderstand. I get praise for my volunteering, because I put in more than the minimum required effort. I don't want to get praise for doing anything less than I do and I don't think that others should get praise for barely passing the bar the way that YouTubers (not just D&P) do. That's not how the world works to me. Dan and Phil do the same thing every other YouTuber does, sometimes better and sometimes worse, they're not special because of it.
phamnotof wrote:
Catallena wrote: lolwut. They didn't learn shit, D&P knew exactly what they were doing during the US tour and that why it bothers me. They almost completely abandoned social media for two months to make another book to sell us and they knew damn well they could because any criticism the phandom has gets burried in praise anyway. The AUS tour won't be featured in the book (or at least not as heavily), so there is no need to keep silent. I'm not giving credit for that, over my dead body :')
lolwut. Nice. Really makes me feel like I'm talking to an adult. I do think they knew what they were doing in the US, but that doesn't mean they didn't hear people's complaints and fixed it while in Australia, and I think they did? Like there was more videos, more interactions - basically everything we complained about not getting while they were in the US. And unless you got your dapgo copy already, I'm fascinated by the authority with which you describe it won't be featured. Obviously not as heavily as the tour was shorter but otherwise, everything seems to suggest they're putting it in, too, as they continued to gather the material for it much like in the US from what was reported.

You're welcome. I hope they did listen to people and decided to do better and that that's why the AUS tour was better than the USA one, but I'm just not gonna praise them for that?? Why should I? 'You decided to not take advantage of your adoring fandom for a second time this year, good job uwu' Nah fam. I'm happy that the AUS tour went differently, I really am, but that's where my praise ends. As far as the book goes, I feel like the US tour will be the main selling point of the book whether AUS will be featured or not (I find it so odd to cram in another tour leg close to what imagine would be a first print date but ok I'm not the poor graphic designer dealing with the deadline here), so keeping quiet while down under served no purpose.
phamnotof wrote:
Catallena wrote:
I didn't include this in my previous post because it was just you saying that you like Phil's collabs and other videos, which we can argue about all day and night. But I'll take the opportunity to express opinions and thoughts about the AP channel anyway. I usually like Phil's solo vlog style videos, but this year they all seemed rushed. Filler videos filmed because he had to have something to upload. The best solo piece he has made was Another Sleepless Night. I don't like Phil's collabs that aren't with Dan, it's all the same concept of playing a silly game and he rarely has chemistry with his guests. Alfie, Caspar, Tyler... all awkward to watch (though the concept for the collab with Tyler was cool). The collab with Hazel was awful, mostly because I can't stand Hazel so that's not Phil's fault, but it was so basic and unimaginative. 'I guess we'll collab because we're kinda friends and it's convenient, lemme get some tour #spon in there as well'. Yikes. I do like Phil and PJ together because I think their brains work in similar ways and there's potential for greatness there, but it doesn't show in any of their collabs so it's always a disappointment for me.

And although I enjoy his collabs with Dan most of the time (I loved the Past Life Animal video but didn't like the Face Swap challenge) the fact that Dan is on AP pretty much every other video is all the proof I need for myself to see that Phil doesn't care anymore. Dan in a video is easy views, he knows that so he keeps putting Dan in every other video. Thing is, it doesn't exactly make a good impression on people (potential subscribers/employers/sponsors) when all your most viewed videos feature this one particular guy whose own most popular videos don't usually feature you. I can't imagine that he doesn't know that so I don't really get what Phil wants with the future of his channel and YouTube career tbh. Yeah they have the Dan & Phil brand now, but Dan seems to have ambitions outside of that while Phil doesn't seem to have any anymore. That used to be different, but hey if he'd rather go out easy like this that's fine I guess. Not my problem.
It's fine you're disappointed with Phil's content, I'm not dictating you how you should feel. I don't agree with you, but whatever, we don't need to agree. My issue is presenting opinions as facts, and they definitely are opinions as there are people (hi!) who feel differently. That was my whole point.
I don't feel like I presented my opinions as facts, sorry if you felt that way. My opinions are strongly worded, but that's really all it is although I understand why someone might get a different impression. I know there are plenty of people who love Phil's content, collabs included, and that there are plenty of people who enjoy Dan's content, ISG included. Whatever floats your boat, I'm glad that it makes you all smile. They still make plenty of content that I do enjoy and that makes me happy as well.

Catallena wrote: I ignored your point because anything that tries to counter my feelings and opinions with accusations of me just being too nostalgic about things is not worth my time. Miss me with that shit. I'm critical of them now and was like that 4 years ago as well, don't ever think that I was a blind stan before. Truth Or Dare was hardly quality content, but at least Dan has enough common sense to stop it while ISG just keeps going on and on because he now likes the easy cash flow he gets from content like that. I like being critical of the artists that I stan. And my critical ass has the opinion that D&P aren't as amazing as the phandom cracks them up to be, that they get praised for doing shit every other YouTuber does, and that before they got distracted by money making side projects they created better YouTube content than they do now.


This is all fine, you feel that was and - you know - I hope you have fun with your phandom experience? Seems very positive. That's your choice though & again, my point was to illustrate that not everyone feels the same way and I've yet to be conviced there's an objective way to measure quality without personal taste affecting us. [/quote]

I love this because you're like 'it's fine we all have different opinions' but at the same you're definitely not fine with my negative POV. Or that's what it feels like to me. As stated in a previous post, I love criticizing my favs just as much as fangirling over them. I'm having loads of fun, I don't need be ~positive~ for that thank you. Again I'm glad that you enjoy everything and are so positive, but can I do it my way? Without being accused of being stuck in the past? Unless we're talking Gen 1 vs. Gen 6 Pokémon, nostalgia is a weak argument.
Catallena wrote: Sub numbers don't mean shit and I feel like their growth is quite slow compared to what it was. Like me and several other people said previously, the only part they really play in keeping the audience in their clutches is the ambiguity of their sexuality and relationship. It's an entertaining mystery, no matter on what side of fence you're on. Content is more important to lure people in, not to keep people there. And because the phandom is so fiercely loyal and very self sufficient, they don't have to do shit for it. If the power and numbers of the phandom relied on the boys themselves cracks would've started showing during the USA tour. They're not responsible for the community that was build, they just benefit from it. That's fine, it's their fandom after all, but again not credit worthy.
phamnotof wrote: "Sub numbers don't mean shit" is an interesting point to put next to "they're growing slower" - like, subs don't matter unless they showcase something negative? Anyway, the numbers I was refering to were views, and they get a lot of views compared to most people who've been successful as long as they've been.
It's really not that strange. The number of subs don't matter. Growth of subs does. That's not a hard concept to grasp I think? Nobody matches their sub count in view count, and the last thing is what makes you money. Sub count just looks cool and gets you shiny play button from YouTube. But not gaining subs is bad, as it means that your channel and content is only a small step away from losing subs. D&P are obviously not there yet, but their growth isn't as much as it was. Even people like Caspar have surpassed them and his views ain't as good as D&P's. Dunno about D&P's view count growing or not, I feel like it's been kinda the same for a year but that might be incorrect. Anyway, stabilizing is never good if it's about YouTube numbers. The only way is up.
phamnotof wrote: So your view is that they lucked into a community they don't deserve, their fandom fell into their laps by accident and we're all here just cause we wanna know if they're shagging? Well. I guess, again, we'll just have to agree to disaggree on all accounts here. I do agree that I enjoy the mystery, but I also enjoy their work immensely & their early content would definitely not lure me in, the current did.

I also think that fostering and being at a centre of a rather special creator/fandom relationship is credit-worthy, but again, agree to disagree.
I never said they don't deserve their fandom, don't reach. But they are definitely very lucky to have such a dedicated and powerful fanbase. They built the foundation, but they don't do any fostering anymore. A distraction from some shit storms here and there maybe, but all they really need to do is exist. Phandom will take care of the rest. We promote them, we support them, we keep them relevant. Plenty of YouTubers come with a decent sized fandom, but the phandom is a bit special and even organizations like the BBC know. There's a reason D&P are probably gonna return to R1 while the other YouTubers aren't.

We are opposites, because I'm not sure I would subscribe. Maybe I would because they seem nice and are sometimes pretty entertaining, but in the end I'd just let most of their videos rot in my subbox (I know me I do this a lot). But they don't need to lure me in anymore, I've been here for the past few years. I've grown to be able to love and criticize them at the same time, out of the point of view of both a fan and someone who doesn't really get their appeal (anymore). But I love them and they still make content that I love. Together with the fandom experience and the shipping, that's enough to make me stay. Without any of those three I think that I would still be fond of them and watch them, but not stan anymore. Many of my old phandom friends that I knew via Tumblr have moved on or are really only in it anymore for the Phan puzzle. Circle of life or some shit I guess.

But yeah, agree to disagree.
phamnotof wrote:

Damn. Recommend giving this a watch with Deppy (well, Dan, I guess, moreso) in mind. Everyone will have to get themselves a kid-friendly persona or else the money might stop raining, I guess, though D&P are both lucky to not rely on per view money anymore.

(I suppose this goes to show why most people who don't make it go on to solo, outside the YT space projects, too, cause YouTube can change on you overnight & you'd be screwed if you didn't have a system in place to sustain your livestyle.)
[/quote]

I'm not really keeping D&P or any vlogger in mind rn, it's far bigger than any of that and I hope everyone realized that. This isn't about swearing and kid friendly personas. The only thing that matters in this is Google actively murdering freedom of speech on the internet. They're trying to control information about current events and that's really dangerous. News and opinion channels like DeFranco's are now only allowed to exist if they don't make money. I wonder if any other social media platforms will respond to this. Facebook has been trying to establish it's video features, but they're just as evil as Google. And Twitter is a mess. So we're all fucked basically. Great. Love that Google knows everything about me.
Image
Twitter *•.(★).•* Tumblr
bear
hobbit hair
Posts: 254
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 5:41 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: New York, USA

Catallena wrote:
I'm not really keeping D&P or any vlogger in mind rn, it's far bigger than any of that and I hope everyone realized that. This isn't about swearing and kid friendly personas. The only thing that matters in this is Google actively murdering freedom of speech on the internet. They're trying to control information about current events and that's really dangerous. News and opinion channels like DeFranco's are now only allowed to exist if they don't make money. I wonder if any other social media platforms will respond to this. Facebook has been trying to establish it's video features, but they're just as evil as Google. And Twitter is a mess. So we're all fucked basically. Great. Love that Google knows everything about me.
Oh god.Oh sh*t. I didn't think about this. This is going to ruin everything. Do you think this will end up killing Youtube in the end? Because part of the reason I and so many other people enjoy it is because of news and opinionated content. This is not good at all.
colfreckles
drama llama
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2016 4:52 am
Pronouns: she/her

anathema wrote: Anyone else here watch Will and RJ? I would honestly love to see them and d&p collab, I think they have a lot of similarities. (Also, their anniversary is October 9th, 2009. I found it funny how close it is to the "phanniversary" :lol: )
I watch them! I have to admit, it was very weird seeing the clash of fandoms in that video lol. I had never noticed deppy in that vlog before!
User avatar
crash[]
butt chair
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 5:28 am
Pronouns: she/her

I'm here to bring the hot goss that Dan doesn't follow Pewds on Twitter anymore (or vice versa). They hate each other now. Bring in the popcorn.

Just kidding, this probably has something to do with Pewds' Twitter account getting suspended earlier today. He's sort of going through a 2007 Britney Spears phase, but only ironically. Don't bother him about it.

Also, because some people have been keeping track of Pewds' likes, he also tweeted this about D&P's Stand Up To Cancer shoot:
phamnotof
morning quiff
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:47 am
Pronouns: she/her

more replies Catallena cause apparently I can't let things rest, but this is my last poke into this convo, I promised both my cat and my therapist... or something :D
Catallena wrote: You misunderstand. I get praise for my volunteering, because I put in more than the minimum required effort. I don't want to get praise for doing anything less than I do and I don't think that others should get praise for barely passing the bar the way that YouTubers (not just D&P) do. That's not how the world works to me. Dan and Phil do the same thing every other YouTuber does, sometimes better and sometimes worse, they're not special because of it.
Oh that's fine, it's your basic premise I disagree with here, though yeah, a bit of a misunderstading about your volunteering activities, though those are hardly the main point here.
Catallena wrote: You're welcome. I hope they did listen to people and decided to do better and that that's why the AUS tour was better than the USA one, but I'm just not gonna praise them for that?? Why should I? 'You decided to not take advantage of your adoring fandom for a second time this year, good job uwu' Nah fam. I'm happy that the AUS tour went differently, I really am, but that's where my praise ends. As far as the book goes, I feel like the US tour will be the main selling point of the book whether AUS will be featured or not (I find it so odd to cram in another tour leg close to what imagine would be a first print date but ok I'm not the poor graphic designer dealing with the deadline here), so keeping quiet while down under served no purpose.
I'm in no way saying you have to praise them - I just also want to be able to express that I see it as a good thing and a sign of learning without being painted with a very broad brush of "everyone praises every fart that comes out of them no matter the smell of it" or whatever your wording was.
Catallena wrote: I don't feel like I presented my opinions as facts, sorry if you felt that way. My opinions are strongly worded, but that's really all it is although I understand why someone might get a different impression. I know there are plenty of people who love Phil's content, collabs included, and that there are plenty of people who enjoy Dan's content, ISG included. Whatever floats your boat, I'm glad that it makes you all smile. They still make plenty of content that I do enjoy and that makes me happy as well.
Well it's nice we're all happy, though just to be clear, my case is not "loves everything", as my previous replies stated, I can have issues with specific things while still having a positive look on things overall. If I hadn't, I'd find keeping up very draining, personally.

Catallena wrote: I love this because you're like 'it's fine we all have different opinions' but at the same you're definitely not fine with my negative POV. Or that's what it feels like to me. As stated in a previous post, I love criticizing my favs just as much as fangirling over them. I'm having loads of fun, I don't need be ~positive~ for that thank you. Again I'm glad that you enjoy everything and are so positive, but can I do it my way? Without being accused of being stuck in the past? Unless we're talking Gen 1 vs. Gen 6 Pokémon, nostalgia is a weak argument.
I'm sorry that's what it feels like to you. I definitely am fine with different opinions, I think they're necessary for a good discussion forum to exist, though yes, personally, I definitely don't like or agree with your views, which might show up in my tone as the evening hours progress and I feel like the main point I'm trying to make keeps getting lost in the noise.

The nostalgia comment was not directed at you, if you recall, you don't really sound like someone who does nostalgia to me, but I maintain that nostalgia colors a lot of people's views when they're talking about their past content as somehow dramatically more well-crafted.
Catallena wrote: It's really not that strange. The number of subs don't matter. Growth of subs does. That's not a hard concept to grasp I think? Nobody matches their sub count in view count, and the last thing is what makes you money. Sub count just looks cool and gets you shiny play button from YouTube. But not gaining subs is bad, as it means that your channel and content is only a small step away from losing subs. D&P are obviously not there yet, but their growth isn't as much as it was. Even people like Caspar have surpassed them and his views ain't as good as D&P's. Dunno about D&P's view count growing or not, I feel like it's been kinda the same for a year but that might be incorrect. Anyway, stabilizing is never good if it's about YouTube numbers. The only way is up.
I think that maintaining a loyal audience is everything wheras getting people to subscribe off of a single video that never come back to your channel again after that (which is the case for people like Caspar, big subs increase, views stay same or even go down). D&P do a great job of keeping their GA interested despite having an uploading schedule that in no way benefits from YT's algorithms. Steady growth over a long period of time is where you want to get with most businesses, and that's what their channels are. A huge increase often preceeds a huge fall (Tyler Oakley, for instance, look at Tyler Oakley's numbers lately).
Catallena wrote: I never said they don't deserve their fandom, don't reach. But they are definitely very lucky to have such a dedicated and powerful fanbase. They built the foundation, but they don't do any fostering anymore. A distraction from some shit storms here and there maybe, but all they really need to do is exist. Phandom will take care of the rest. We promote them, we support them, we keep them relevant. Plenty of YouTubers come with a decent sized fandom, but the phandom is a bit special and even organizations like the BBC know. There's a reason D&P are probably gonna return to R1 while the other YouTubers aren't.

We are opposites, because I'm not sure I would subscribe. Maybe I would because they seem nice and are sometimes pretty entertaining, but in the end I'd just let most of their videos rot in my subbox (I know me I do this a lot). But they don't need to lure me in anymore, I've been here for the past few years. I've grown to be able to love and criticize them at the same time, out of the point of view of both a fan and someone who doesn't really get their appeal (anymore). But I love them and they still make content that I love. Together with the fandom experience and the shipping, that's enough to make me stay. Without any of those three I think that I would still be fond of them and watch them, but not stan anymore. Many of my old phandom friends that I knew via Tumblr have moved on or are really only in it anymore for the Phan puzzle. Circle of life or some shit I guess.

But yeah, agree to disagree.
"They're not responsible for the community that was build, they just benefit from it" definitely sounded like you were saying they don't deserve their fandom to me, but I'm glad to know I was mistaken then. I do agree they're lucky, but I also think lucky doesn't equal undeserving. They do quite a bit to foster a community in my mind, be it twitter interaction that keeps people responding, fanart promotion/acknowledgement that keeps people working, liveshows that build personal connections more than anything - they benefit from doing that, of course, but that doesn't negate it from existance in my view.

"We are opposites" might be a good way to summarize all this, alas, yeah, agree to disagree, and I can't believe I woke up at 4 am and felt the need to type this out, I might be due an IDB break to like, sort my priorities. :D

Catallena wrote:I'm not really keeping D&P or any vlogger in mind rn, it's far bigger than any of that and I hope everyone realized that. This isn't about swearing and kid friendly personas. The only thing that matters in this is Google actively murdering freedom of speech on the internet. They're trying to control information about current events and that's really dangerous. News and opinion channels like DeFranco's are now only allowed to exist if they don't make money. I wonder if any other social media platforms will respond to this. Facebook has been trying to establish it's video features, but they're just as evil as Google. And Twitter is a mess. So we're all fucked basically. Great. Love that Google knows everything about me.
Of course it's bigger, and you're not saying anything the video itself doesn't already, relating it to D&P on a D&P forum doesn't serve to dismiss that? But boy, I'm not the most positive person in the world, but next to you, I feel like one.
User avatar
confusedpanda
ar·tic·u·late
Posts: 417
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:20 pm
Pronouns: Her/she
Location: Somewhere in the USA

phamnotof wrote:

Damn. Recommend giving this a watch with Deppy (well, Dan, I guess, moreso) in mind. Everyone will have to get themselves a kid-friendly persona or else the money might stop raining, I guess, though D&P are both lucky to not rely on per view money anymore.

(I suppose this goes to show why most people who don't make it go on to solo, outside the YT space projects, too, cause YouTube can change on you overnight & you'd be screwed if you didn't have a system in place to sustain your livestyle.)
As i was writing a response to this, a youtuber tweeted this What's good is nothing has changed in the terms and conditions, meaning they didn't just suddenly add those rules and didn't tell anyone, they've been there for a while. Whats bad is, stronger reinforcement on mostly news and other supposed "trigger topics" have been happening. They didn't tell anyone they were going to strongly inforce those rules. That is what was not fair to the people this effected, which from what I saw, effected a girl who did videos on acne cover up, Luke Cutforth's video on depression and of course people who cover current events. There's even more people effected by this whole thing that I didn't even see being talked about. I think what happened was, people have been after youtube for months to find away to deal with actual bullying, harassment and actual triggering content getting some type of punishment. So youtube finally chose to listen, they picked the punishment to be ad rev removed from suspected videos that have those issues so took their rules more seriously but in the process, accidentally effected the other youtubers who didn't fall under these issues Dear god, they better let these people get their ads back on these videos.
Youtube was, is and will always be broken. They can't leave well enough alone. They attempt to fix something and managed to cause a ripple effect. There is a statement coming from youtube tomorrow apparently, probably just as vague statement knowing them. :roll: But I really hope they clear this whole thing up. Because it sounds like they fucked up, big time.
We're here, we're queer, we're filled with existential fear!
Image
gif cred: pseudophan on tumblr
User avatar
mysterylovescompany
philussy
Posts: 476
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:56 am

Let's talk about houseplants?
I mean ... happy Septempber! Here's the teachers!AU that is in so many phanfics. :lol:

Image
source: danandphilhq
User avatar
Ticia
suspended
Posts: 810
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:19 pm
Pronouns: her / she
Location: Europe

I'm voting for 'pierced nipples'. What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Punk!Danyul is real.
Image
User avatar
danphil333
hobbit hair
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 5:59 pm

bluebox-away wrote:For those (myself included) who were grumbling about Phil not interacting enough on twitter, he actually did some proper replying tonight! Standard, robotic, jetlag-travel-no-food tweet, but look, actual replies and only 1 emoji!
Meanwhile dan tweeted this: interesting, funny, deep, meaningful, groundbreaking stuff right there on his tweets and replies.
Image
thats such a great example of how much better :clapping: he is when it comes to interaction with his fans. i am emotional :cry: HE LOVES US :wahh:
Image
akui
blobfish
Posts: 679
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:50 am
Pronouns: She/Her
Location: Snowy Pear

phamnotof, i just don't feel like you understand me, my basic point is simple, what you like, doesn't mean is good, there is a general consense in the industry to deem what is good art and what is not, of course there are exceptions, but overall, there is a standard.

Just imagine this, if there is a youtube emmy, with industry professionals to judge who's win who's not, do you genuently think that deppy these days will win? Or even just get nomintated??? No.

Mediocre creators do what's popular, good creators do whats profound, and great creators do whats profound and make it popular. I want deppy to be good, and not just follow the trend and to be everyone.

Dan sometimes in his liveshows he would defend himself for what he does or over explain his videos, even when nobody criticize him, just shows how insecure he is, and one big part of his extential crisis is coming from that he think what he does is not important, even tho at the end he always say some sentimental shit about "you appriciate us, and we enjoy what we do, that's what's important". But is it tho? I think in his deepest desire he wants to be not just popular but also important, he wants to leave a legacy, he wants to be shakespeare. He said that he want to do more documentary, or other things, as long as he still wants that, i support him.

As for Phil, indeed he wants his channel to be a happy place, but more importantly, he needs to be happy about his work to make others happy. If he's not enjoy what he's doing, one day it will show (it already showed), and his audiences will know. I don't know what exactly what Phil wants, but whatever he wants, i wanna see him actually do it, fight for it, and i'm sure everyone will be there to cheer for him. But for now i just don't see him doing anything.

PS. i'm sorry for all the typos and grammar mistakes, i'm typing this in class without auto correction, very horrifying experience.
trashqueen
ar·tic·u·late
Posts: 422
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 1:46 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: south america

akui wrote: Just imagine this, if there is a youtube emmy, with industry professionals to judge who's win who's not, do you genuently think that deppy these days will win? Or even just get nomintated??? No.
well the emmys give awards to mainstream economically successful artists not obscure artistic experimental ones so i'm pretty sure they would get nominated

that also goes for the oscars (and their mostly hollywood fake deep winning movies) and all the mtv award shows

i think that if you look at the youtube bigger picture deppy go in the 'successful and mainstream, but not making mindless trash clickbaity content' which i think is the category that would get plenty of attention in the hypothetical youtube awards

i'm enjoying reading this discussion, can't really participate more than to say this because i feel like expecting deppy to make something that isn't just funny cutesy 'let's forget about real life problems for a sec' content is ridiculous because that's literally all they have ever done and exactly what i want from them (even if i'm the biggest fan of getting some Opinions™ out of them i still feel like that any other more 'serious' stuff belongs on their side content like liveshows or twitter) tl,dr:i judge their content based on how much it makes me smile or laugh so to me they are doing fine (could use more sketches and stories and less isg on dinof tho), quality is subjective and depends on your expectations
Last edited by trashqueen on Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Dan Howell wrote:'[someone] just sent me a message saying 'Phil'..... same'
teamug
pumpkin spice pumpkin cookie
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:41 am

butting into a convo unasked.
akui wrote:phamnotof, i just don't feel like you understand me, my basic point is simple, what you like, doesn't mean is good, there is a general consense in the industry to deem what is good art and what is not, of course there are exceptions, but overall, there is a standard.
not a fan of the industry standards argument, this is not directed at you personally (though it seems that way as I am quoting you (sorry 'bout that)) But I have always felt very strongly about pushing boundries, exceeding set values especially in the Arts. Art is such a beautiful and complex matter, that easily can flow into other, even contradictory areas. If even a single person enjoys what you have created, was it not worth making?
akui wrote:Just imagine this, if there is a youtube emmy, with industry professionals to judge who's win who's not, do you genuently think that deppy these days will win? Or even just get nomintated??? No.
Most win due to popularity that is bought. But this is mostly me being bitter about awards in general.
akui wrote:Mediocre creators do what's popular, good creators do whats profound, and great creators do whats profound and make it popular. I want deppy to be good, and not just follow the trend and to be everyone.
I really do like and agree with what you say. But at the same time, I think it is idealistic (telling myself this more). Sometimes you have to put aside your potential and expectations of yourself to, put it bluntly, pay the bills. I get annoyed when people reason that because deps are wealthy now (as is assumed) that they should no longer focus on the route that brought them success and wealth, they are still so young, whatever money that have saved and keep earning, retirement can be very expensive. I hope they to figure out how to continue their careers, and I hope its' in a manner I still want to enjoy with them.

To akui I want to apologize for hijacking your comment, you brought up thoughts that I have my own thoughts to. The "what is good" part actually reminded me of a day many years ago that I spent fuming at the Guggenheim in NY, (everyone said it was a must to-do) at the time I was in a mindless rant (about ticket prices, toddlers with cans of paint, and visions of throwing myself into a vat of paint and running at walls), I am not a fan of modern art, and that day did not change my mind, but looking back now, your post helped with that, it makes me smile and I am glad I went.

Also, I seem to be amongst the few that prefer their newer content to their older, so...yeah. that about covers that.
akui
blobfish
Posts: 679
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:50 am
Pronouns: She/Her
Location: Snowy Pear

trashqueen wrote: well the emmys give awards to mainstream economically successful artists not obscure artistic experimental ones so i'm pretty sure they would get nominated
that also goes for the oscars (and their mostly hollywood fake deep winning movies) and all the mtv award shows
You know what i meant was a fair version of emmy, i feel like you are just trolling me.
trashqueen wrote:i think that if you look at the youtube bigger picture deppy go in the 'successful and mainstream, but not making mindless trash clickbaity content' which i think is the category that would get plenty of attention in the hypothetical youtube awards
OMG the bar is so low

to teamug thank you for the last paragraph, i feel like we are bonding. :platonic:
teamug wrote:
not a fan of the industry standards argument, this is not directed at you personally (though it seems that way as I am quoting you (sorry 'bout that)) But I have always felt very strongly about pushing boundries, exceeding set values especially in the Arts. Art is such a beautiful and complex matter, that easily can flow into other, even contradictory areas. If even a single person enjoys what you have created, was it not worth making?
I am all for pushing boundaries, that's why i say there are exceptions, but can you really say that what deps do are pushing boundaries? No, not really.

As for personal enjoyment, a lot people do enjoy their content now, that's a good thing, i wouldn't say "it's worthless", but i do think that everybody, should at least try to be better. (Yes, very idealistic)
teamug wrote:I really do like and agree with what you say. But at the same time, I think it is idealistic (telling myself this more). Sometimes you have to put aside your potential and expectations of yourself to, put it bluntly, pay the bills. I get annoyed when people reason that because deps are wealthy now (as is assumed) that they should no longer focus on the route that brought them success and wealth, they are still so young, whatever money that have saved and keep earning, retirement can be very expensive. I hope they to figure out how to continue their careers, and I hope its' in a manner I still want to enjoy with them.
I admit i'm a very idealistic person, but even we see it realistically, their current business model is not very sustainable, they are getting older and so does their audiences, and their taste changes, how long they are gonna last depend on fluffy phan moment and #relatable, and with more and more competition how can they win the next generation of viewers over? Not to mention youtube is turning more and more into a mature entertainment industry, now there are maybe a production team behind some famous channels, if deppy don't step up their game(not saying they also need to get a production team tho), how they gonna catch up with it? Yes they are young, but that doesn't mean they are safe, "one day you are in, and the next day you are out". I think they have potential and room for growth, but if they think that too, they need to show it, don't they?
User avatar
swofro
angel bean
Posts: 1028
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 6:39 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: asia

Ticia wrote:I'm voting for 'pierced nipples'. What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Punk!Danyul is real.
I am still thinking third nipple tbh :gg:
Love is forever
Image
Amelie
delia smith
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 9:30 am

phamnotof wrote:
Ok, What actually is this??? Do they think that everyone who watches youtube is an actual child. I literally watch youtube because no one is afraid to swear/talk about bigger issues/include a whole lot of innuendo. If I wanted to watch a kids show I would.

I kind of want to make a swear-y, innuendo filled video that gets millions of views with no advertisers benefitting from this because its too "innapropriate" for the people viewing it. Its not like most of the advertising is for children. I generally get make-up and university ads, which I'm pretty sure don't need to be accompanied with a boring childrens video. I really hope this doesn't affect any youtubers content, as the best thing that can happen is youtube losing ad money because the bigger creators choose to swear occasionally and actually have opinions

Sorry, rant over (kind of :sideeye: )

(Also I vote paleness for why Dan covers up more. Living with Phil literally seems to be continually making him paler ;) )
User avatar
DryCereal
koi pond
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:59 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: UK

RE: The PdF/Adsense saga... Creators have the right to produce and upload whatever content they want. Advertisers have the right to specify if they don't want their brand associated with a particular video/channel. Such is life.
Amelie wrote:(Also I vote paleness for why Dan covers up more. Living with Phil literally seems to be continually making him paler ;) )
Maybe we've been wrong all this time and it's Phil who's the succubus. Fffffffuuuuuuuu-! #SaveDan
IckleMissMayhem's evil fic writing alter ego. :twisted:
antigone
butt chair
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:30 pm
Location: London, UK

uuuggghhhhh I would like a dapg video plsssssssssss
User avatar
Catallena
classy cat lady
classy cat lady
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:56 pm
Location: The Netherlands

phamnotof wrote:more replies Catallena cause apparently I can't let things rest, but this is my last poke into this convo, I promised both my cat and my therapist... or something :D
Catallena wrote: You misunderstand. I get praise for my volunteering, because I put in more than the minimum required effort. I don't want to get praise for doing anything less than I do and I don't think that others should get praise for barely passing the bar the way that YouTubers (not just D&P) do. That's not how the world works to me. Dan and Phil do the same thing every other YouTuber does, sometimes better and sometimes worse, they're not special because of it.
Oh that's fine, it's your basic premise I disagree with here, though yeah, a bit of a misunderstading about your volunteering activities, though those are hardly the main point here.
Catallena wrote: You're welcome. I hope they did listen to people and decided to do better and that that's why the AUS tour was better than the USA one, but I'm just not gonna praise them for that?? Why should I? 'You decided to not take advantage of your adoring fandom for a second time this year, good job uwu' Nah fam. I'm happy that the AUS tour went differently, I really am, but that's where my praise ends. As far as the book goes, I feel like the US tour will be the main selling point of the book whether AUS will be featured or not (I find it so odd to cram in another tour leg close to what imagine would be a first print date but ok I'm not the poor graphic designer dealing with the deadline here), so keeping quiet while down under served no purpose.
I'm in no way saying you have to praise them - I just also want to be able to express that I see it as a good thing and a sign of learning without being painted with a very broad brush of "everyone praises every fart that comes out of them no matter the smell of it" or whatever your wording was.
Catallena wrote: I don't feel like I presented my opinions as facts, sorry if you felt that way. My opinions are strongly worded, but that's really all it is although I understand why someone might get a different impression. I know there are plenty of people who love Phil's content, collabs included, and that there are plenty of people who enjoy Dan's content, ISG included. Whatever floats your boat, I'm glad that it makes you all smile. They still make plenty of content that I do enjoy and that makes me happy as well.
Well it's nice we're all happy, though just to be clear, my case is not "loves everything", as my previous replies stated, I can have issues with specific things while still having a positive look on things overall. If I hadn't, I'd find keeping up very draining, personally.

Catallena wrote: I love this because you're like 'it's fine we all have different opinions' but at the same you're definitely not fine with my negative POV. Or that's what it feels like to me. As stated in a previous post, I love criticizing my favs just as much as fangirling over them. I'm having loads of fun, I don't need be ~positive~ for that thank you. Again I'm glad that you enjoy everything and are so positive, but can I do it my way? Without being accused of being stuck in the past? Unless we're talking Gen 1 vs. Gen 6 Pokémon, nostalgia is a weak argument.
I'm sorry that's what it feels like to you. I definitely am fine with different opinions, I think they're necessary for a good discussion forum to exist, though yes, personally, I definitely don't like or agree with your views, which might show up in my tone as the evening hours progress and I feel like the main point I'm trying to make keeps getting lost in the noise.

The nostalgia comment was not directed at you, if you recall, you don't really sound like someone who does nostalgia to me, but I maintain that nostalgia colors a lot of people's views when they're talking about their past content as somehow dramatically more well-crafted.
Catallena wrote: It's really not that strange. The number of subs don't matter. Growth of subs does. That's not a hard concept to grasp I think? Nobody matches their sub count in view count, and the last thing is what makes you money. Sub count just looks cool and gets you shiny play button from YouTube. But not gaining subs is bad, as it means that your channel and content is only a small step away from losing subs. D&P are obviously not there yet, but their growth isn't as much as it was. Even people like Caspar have surpassed them and his views ain't as good as D&P's. Dunno about D&P's view count growing or not, I feel like it's been kinda the same for a year but that might be incorrect. Anyway, stabilizing is never good if it's about YouTube numbers. The only way is up.
I think that maintaining a loyal audience is everything wheras getting people to subscribe off of a single video that never come back to your channel again after that (which is the case for people like Caspar, big subs increase, views stay same or even go down). D&P do a great job of keeping their GA interested despite having an uploading schedule that in no way benefits from YT's algorithms. Steady growth over a long period of time is where you want to get with most businesses, and that's what their channels are. A huge increase often preceeds a huge fall (Tyler Oakley, for instance, look at Tyler Oakley's numbers lately).
Catallena wrote: I never said they don't deserve their fandom, don't reach. But they are definitely very lucky to have such a dedicated and powerful fanbase. They built the foundation, but they don't do any fostering anymore. A distraction from some shit storms here and there maybe, but all they really need to do is exist. Phandom will take care of the rest. We promote them, we support them, we keep them relevant. Plenty of YouTubers come with a decent sized fandom, but the phandom is a bit special and even organizations like the BBC know. There's a reason D&P are probably gonna return to R1 while the other YouTubers aren't.

We are opposites, because I'm not sure I would subscribe. Maybe I would because they seem nice and are sometimes pretty entertaining, but in the end I'd just let most of their videos rot in my subbox (I know me I do this a lot). But they don't need to lure me in anymore, I've been here for the past few years. I've grown to be able to love and criticize them at the same time, out of the point of view of both a fan and someone who doesn't really get their appeal (anymore). But I love them and they still make content that I love. Together with the fandom experience and the shipping, that's enough to make me stay. Without any of those three I think that I would still be fond of them and watch them, but not stan anymore. Many of my old phandom friends that I knew via Tumblr have moved on or are really only in it anymore for the Phan puzzle. Circle of life or some shit I guess.

But yeah, agree to disagree.
"They're not responsible for the community that was build, they just benefit from it" definitely sounded like you were saying they don't deserve their fandom to me, but I'm glad to know I was mistaken then. I do agree they're lucky, but I also think lucky doesn't equal undeserving. They do quite a bit to foster a community in my mind, be it twitter interaction that keeps people responding, fanart promotion/acknowledgement that keeps people working, liveshows that build personal connections more than anything - they benefit from doing that, of course, but that doesn't negate it from existance in my view.

"We are opposites" might be a good way to summarize all this, alas, yeah, agree to disagree, and I can't believe I woke up at 4 am and felt the need to type this out, I might be due an IDB break to like, sort my priorities. :D

Catallena wrote:I'm not really keeping D&P or any vlogger in mind rn, it's far bigger than any of that and I hope everyone realized that. This isn't about swearing and kid friendly personas. The only thing that matters in this is Google actively murdering freedom of speech on the internet. They're trying to control information about current events and that's really dangerous. News and opinion channels like DeFranco's are now only allowed to exist if they don't make money. I wonder if any other social media platforms will respond to this. Facebook has been trying to establish it's video features, but they're just as evil as Google. And Twitter is a mess. So we're all fucked basically. Great. Love that Google knows everything about me.
Of course it's bigger, and you're not saying anything the video itself doesn't already, relating it to D&P on a D&P forum doesn't serve to dismiss that? But boy, I'm not the most positive person in the world, but next to you, I feel like one.
You get your last word.

And I just thought that it was weird to go 'I wonder how this will affect two vloggers who don't touch current events or controversial topics with even a ten foot pole' when Google is slowly going full internet dictator on all of us. I know that it's a D&P centered forum, but vloggers who swear sometimes are so low on my list of reasons why this is bad it's not even funny. For the past few years organizations like Google or Facebook and governments around the world have been trying to get rid of privacy and free speech on an open internet, and yeah I'm hella pessimistic about that and the future. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
IckleMissMayhem wrote:RE: The PdF/Adsense saga... Creators have the right to produce and upload whatever content they want. Advertisers have the right to specify if they don't want their brand associated with a particular video/channel. Such is life.
It's only independent media like Philip DeFranco that they're taking out though. CNN is still running ads on their videos because 1. Money 2. The government has more control over them and other traditional media than they have over the little guys of YouTube. It's very possible that the whole 'ad friendly' thing is bullshit and just an excuse to censor opinions and news that puts governments or organizations in bad light.

Yes I know I'm all about it :') *X Files theme plays in the background*
Image
Twitter *•.(★).•* Tumblr
Locked

Return to “Daniel Howell & Phil Lester”