

Gif credits: thatqueerangel on Tumblr
*licks lips*
Anonymousse wrote: I wonder how it's like to be Dan's lips...
Not like in the "creepy way", but like how much pain can they handle
jaej wrote: however as haru as a character is an underage teenage boy...
GG wrote:*the site that shall not be named, ty
http://www.drinkfinder.co.uk/blog/spirits/kah-tequila/madmadmad wrote:
What are those skull things btw, I have a distinct memory that I have seen them before but I can't for the life of me remember where?
I know how you both feel. It is hard to explain things like this to young people sometimes because so much has changed in the world. It is hard to express these kinds of sentiments without people misinterpreting what you mean. I'm glad that sexuality & gender can be expressed in an array of ways (& not just in the academic realm!), but I'm also wary of labelling the fuck out of people because that can lead to issues as well.cora808 wrote:I totally 120% agree. Back in the day, we just wanted people to acknowledge that there was more than gay or straight, male or female.Mama_Phan wrote:
I dont know how to jump into the conversation about he is bi or not. I get that some people want to have representation, but for me I dont need someone to label themselves and its so hard for people these days because they feel they have to put a definition on who they are as sexual beings but maybe because I am older I dont see the need. There is so much more to each of us than who we are attracted to.
My wish is that one day there is no labels and no assumptions, that we are all just beautiful humans with different ways of thinking and feeling, emotionally and sexually with out judgment.
But it seems like nowadays, people almost obsess over that perfect label identifying their very exact identity and it's like, 20 words long. It's OK, be you. Be happy with you.
Now let's get back to obsessing over D&P's shelves and fringes and mispronunciations of foreign languages
It's on Hulu if you have that or can piggyback on someone's sign-in infocora808 wrote:Because I've not only heard of it a million times, and seen cosplay of it a million times, and heard my friends babble on about it a million times, but also because Dan sold it as he did, I'm finally going to just shut up and watch Death Note. Right now. We'll see how this goes, Mr. Howell.
Edit: THEY DON'T HAVE THE DEATH NOTE ANIME ON CRUNCHYROLL, GOD-DAN-IT
Nah, I doubt the DINI video is part of the spon. One, it's boring for people who don't really care about anime. It was like a laundry list with recommendations and some cheeky throw away comments (mostly to do with speedos *cough*), with no fully formed entertainment components, such as sketches. It was legit just him talking to the camera with just some edits onto the screen. And it doesn't have AD in the thumbnail/title and he didn't promote the second one on twitter. Which, if I was crunchyroll, I'd make sure he did. And, he didn't seem like he was just listing off anime because someone gave him a list and was like "make this sound genuine." He truly gushed about some of those.Vivastian wrote:
And honestly, I am even less confident about Dan posting on DINI. Unless Crunchyroll specifically told him to make two videos instead of one like Phil, the Recommendations video was because of not meeting requirements, which I imagine is him trying to avoid being too #sponny on DINOF, and that's a situation which I don't think we'll likely again see.
The video was pleasant, and it was great that if it had to be #spon, it was on something which we know he actively enjoys.
I found the Recommendations video fascinating; the camera quality wasn't the only thing reminding me of YouNow. It seemed to me that with the format being more direct and salesman-like, and his persona having dropped substantially, it allowed for some nerves to set in. (The repetition of words, at the very least, made me think he was very conscious of audience's reception during filming.)
It could also be a result of talking about 'cute boys in speedos' or Phil (the laugh at 2:10-ish), or a combination of the three.
On labels - they are a double-edged sword, to be sure, but obviously we can't forget that they can be used to include as well as exclude, and empower as well as disempower.
Vivastian wrote:On labels - they are a double-edged sword, to be sure, but obviously we can't forget that they can be used to include as well as exclude, and empower as well as disempower.
[offtopic]My issue with the labels being used these days is that I find myself constantly being accused of being ___phobic because I didn't used 2 of the 5 labels someone has chosen to identify as, unbeknownst to me.[/offtopic]blueapple_x wrote:Vivastian wrote:On labels - they are a double-edged sword, to be sure, but obviously we can't forget that they can be used to include as well as exclude, and empower as well as disempower.
Thank you for saying this.
OT: At the end of the day, it’s nobody’s place to tell someone else what they should and shouldn’t do with regards to how they want to/don't want to identify themselves. Some people like and use labels, some people don’t. That’s completely fine. Nobody has to label themselves if they don’t want to but they shouldn’t knock people who DO want to label themselves by saying labels are stupid/shouldn’t exist. Likewise, if a person prefers labels, they shouldn’t knock on people who don’t want to use labels.
cora808 wrote:[offtopic]My issue with the labels being used these days is that I find myself constantly being accused of being ___phobic because I didn't used 2 of the 5 labels someone has chosen to identify as, unbeknownst to me.[/offtopic]blueapple_x wrote:Vivastian wrote:On labels - they are a double-edged sword, to be sure, but obviously we can't forget that they can be used to include as well as exclude, and empower as well as disempower.
Thank you for saying this.
OT: At the end of the day, it’s nobody’s place to tell someone else what they should and shouldn’t do with regards to how they want to/don't want to identify themselves. Some people like and use labels, some people don’t. That’s completely fine. Nobody has to label themselves if they don’t want to but they shouldn’t knock people who DO want to label themselves by saying labels are stupid/shouldn’t exist. Likewise, if a person prefers labels, they shouldn’t knock on people who don’t want to use labels.
blueapple_x wrote:cora808 wrote:[offtopic]My issue with the labels being used these days is that I find myself constantly being accused of being ___phobic because I didn't used 2 of the 5 labels someone has chosen to identify as, unbeknownst to me.[/offtopic]blueapple_x wrote:Vivastian wrote:On labels - they are a double-edged sword, to be sure, but obviously we can't forget that they can be used to include as well as exclude, and empower as well as disempower.
Thank you for saying this.
OT: At the end of the day, it’s nobody’s place to tell someone else what they should and shouldn’t do with regards to how they want to/don't want to identify themselves. Some people like and use labels, some people don’t. That’s completely fine. Nobody has to label themselves if they don’t want to but they shouldn’t knock people who DO want to label themselves by saying labels are stupid/shouldn’t exist. Likewise, if a person prefers labels, they shouldn’t knock on people who don’t want to use labels.
2011/2012 Dan would be cringing so hard.rizzo wrote:I'm gonna make a post out of left field because I have nothing to contribute to the current convo. Do you, Dan. And by that I mean do whoever you want. Consensually.
danandphilhq have been posting old photobooth pics of dan and phil and it got me thinking about how inseparable they are. i know we've discussed "codependency" to death or whatever you want to call their attachment, but i'm speaking more to their connection in the public eye.
perhaps it's just me, but i find it almost weird to see one without the other these days. there is absolutely zero level of independence here in terms of their image. even TW? zalfie can go a video or two without mentioning the other. but here we have dan and phil who bring up their other half once every minute on every public platform they have. and what this does is make it weird for me to look at, for example, these old pics where one is without the other and not be slightly thrown.
do they realize they're doing this? is it entirely on purpose for the brand? is this just me? like... i'm beginning to forget the last video i saw where one of them hadn't mentioned the other and it all just reminds me of that time dan said "it's dan. dan-and-phil dan." they're just.... one.
just thinking aloud here, feel free to scroll on by~
I'm with this 100%. The only reason I'm invested in his sexuality is that it'd lend more evidence towards his relationship with Phil, and I'm only interested in his relationship with Phil because of the ambiguous mystery aspect of it. I don't really care if he comes out and I don't feel the same need for representation that others do. I'm personally wary of providing a definite label of my sexuality because it's not a super defining trait of my personality and I could understand if someone in the public eye didn't want it to be either. If they're attracted to someone, they're attracted to them. It doesn't need to mean more than that. It's totally fine if any of you like to label your sexualities. I certainly appreciate it in the dating scene.akui wrote:Personally i couldn't give less shit about Dan's sexuality, like whatever. My sole interest is on his relationship with phil.
But i have to say him being ambiguous about his sexuality on his main channel without the intention to come out as anything, will only lead to more rumors and speculations to distract people from his work.
So,
Video quality 10/10
Upcoming rumor level 10/10
Btw i guess many would argue that who don't believe he is bi are heteronorm, but we have to remember fictional boys are not like real boys after all.
So even though i personally believe he's bi, i still don't think this video proof anything more than a few memes. if he made a video about real life sexy male celebs, i would 100% see it as a coming out/bi proof.
Maybe it's just because tequila is my very own "delete memory" button, but this exchange to me was priceless!Anonymousse wrote:http://www.drinkfinder.co.uk/blog/spirits/kah-tequila/madmadmad wrote:
What are those skull things btw, I have a distinct memory that I have seen them before but I can't for the life of me remember where?
Netflix too.achika wrote:It's on Hulu if you have that or can piggyback on someone's sign-in infocora808 wrote:Because I've not only heard of it a million times, and seen cosplay of it a million times, and heard my friends babble on about it a million times, but also because Dan sold it as he did, I'm finally going to just shut up and watch Death Note. Right now. We'll see how this goes, Mr. Howell.
Edit: THEY DON'T HAVE THE DEATH NOTE ANIME ON CRUNCHYROLL, GOD-DAN-IT
I didn't think it was full #spon because he recommended Anime that wasn't on Crunchyroll and said to go buy it/watch on other streaming sites not illegelly download them. Unlike Phil who only recommended Anime that was on there so that is why his video was full #sponVivastian wrote: And honestly, I am even less confident about Dan posting on DINI. Unless Crunchyroll specifically told him to make two videos instead of one like Phil, the Recommendations video was because of not meeting requirements, which I imagine is him trying to avoid being too #sponny on DINOF, and that's a situation which I don't think we'll likely again see.
It is on Netflix well at least UK Netflix, that is how I watched it.Anonymousse wrote: Edit: THEY DON'T HAVE THE DEATH NOTE ANIME ON CRUNCHYROLL, GOD-DAN-IT
Yes. We just assume these days that if they are out (At the cinema, at a restaurant etc) they are out together not separately. They have the same friends and the same interests yes but they work and live together surely they would some time apart. The only time they have been apart latley is when Dan went on a Family holiday to Sri Lanka and Phil went "Up north".rizzo wrote:I'm gonna make a post out of left field because I have nothing to contribute to the current convo. Do you, Dan. And by that I mean do whoever you want. Consensually.
danandphilhq have been posting old photobooth pics of dan and phil and it got me thinking about how inseparable they are. i know we've discussed "codependency" to death or whatever you want to call their attachment, but i'm speaking more to their connection in the public eye.
perhaps it's just me, but i find it almost weird to see one without the other these days. there is absolutely zero level of independence here in terms of their image. even TW? zalfie can go a video or two without mentioning the other. but here we have dan and phil who bring up their other half once every minute on every public platform they have. and what this does is make it weird for me to look at, for example, these old pics where one is without the other and not be slightly thrown.
do they realize they're doing this? is it entirely on purpose for the brand? is this just me? like... i'm beginning to forget the last video i saw where one of them hadn't mentioned the other and it all just reminds me of that time dan said "it's dan. dan-and-phil dan." they're just.... one.
just thinking aloud here, feel free to scroll on by~