

gif credit to pseudophan
You bring up a really good point here! I saw people commenting Dan and Phil were further apart, but I think that's just the position the ipad was in. It was in the middle for most of the time because they were both reading which negated one of them leaning into the other's space while the other was controlling it. And you're right, their arms were basically touching at a few points.awsugar wrote:all i knew about dream daddy prior to the video is the basic premise of dad dating and that lots of my friends have really enjoyed it. so going to it basically blind i actually liked this! i'm shocked by so many people saying they didn't and that deppy seem off or different. i didn't get that feeling at all. and as for sitting further away from each other, that's another thing i didn't notice. when i did notice their proximity it was only to note that they were sitting pretty closely together and almost completely touching arms at a few parts.
I've watched Mark's playthrough and a smidgen of Jack's and I definitely agree with you. Mark and Jack are pretty solidly straight (right? If I'm wrong let me know) so I think they didn't have any pressure to react a certain way. They could be cheesy and joke around about their favorite dads whereas Deppy's actions are so analyzed at every moment and I think they took that into account. Love the dads too much and everyone proclaims they're coming out. Tone down the humor/love and everyone thinks they're bored. Kind of a lose-lose situation. I personally loved their kind of rushed, commentary heavy playthrough since I've been watching Mark's and really just wanted to see their take on the game versus just watching for the story.awsugar wrote:first time i've had my thread name suggestion picked! that's one of my favorite vines and it's just too perfect for that whole roommate comment. or just dans facial expression at that point in the video.
also, i'm not sure if anyone mentioned this but i have a theory as to why people who have watched other let's plays of this might find it boring or think that they were bored. i actually don't watch any other tourubers aside from beauty channels so i can't be certain but i think a lot of the others playing this game (markiplier, jacksepticeye, etc) are straight. so i think to them the concept of themselves playing a queer dating sim is probably...a bit humorous in its very nature. not in a homophobic way, just in a way that if you're straight and you're role playing as a dad seducing other dads there is a bit of humor there.
and i think that if you're actually queer (see: dan and phil) that added layer of humor just isn't there. which i think could maybe contribute to people seeing them as bored.
this is completely just theory and i may not have worded it right and i haven't seen any other videos of people playing this but it came to mind as one possible explanation.
this is a view i share and also why there's so much opportunity for games like this to be played in a problematic way.awsugar wrote:also, i'm not sure if anyone mentioned this but i have a theory as to why people who have watched other let's plays of this might find it boring or think that they were bored. i actually don't watch any other tourubers aside from beauty channels so i can't be certain but i think a lot of the others playing this game (markiplier, jacksepticeye, etc) are straight. so i think to them the concept of themselves playing a queer dating sim is probably...a bit humorous in its very nature. not in a homophobic way, just in a way that if you're straight and you're role playing as a dad seducing other dads there is a bit of humor there.
and i think that if you're actually queer (see: dan and phil) that added layer of humor just isn't there. which i think could maybe contribute to people seeing them as bored.
my take is that phil is not at all confident when it comes to flirting, especially verbally, and he just didn't want to do it/rationalized that dan would be more comfortable and convincing.mermaid blood wrote: phil being hesitant to do the dad voice, suggesting dan do it instead and that he'd be 'better' at amanda's voice, was verrrry interesting to me. in way that isn't straight forward, either. i need to read some other opinions on that part.
I also cringed and had to pause to make sure i heard that part right; then i realised it was an unfortunate sentence string. i genuinely don't think he was conflating the two. but identifying the toggled option by a physicality common to non-white people, and then saying immediately after what you liked about it (with an existing problematic cliche, nonetheless) has the effect of it basically sounding like that anyway.Katka wrote: (Also monolid eyes are not sneaky, what the fuck even was that comment, can we not go there.)
totally agree, boundaries are and will always be there, we're just witnessing them shift.kai wrote:(definitely agree though that them being very aware of how closely the entire video will be analysed would've affected their behaviour at least a little bit, but. you could say that about pretty much every video they've posted in the last few years, so to me it just feels like they're doing the same thing they've always done, which is sharing exactly what they're comfortable with us getting our hooks into, and nothing more. the boundaries are still there, just more relaxed on a surface level these days.)
rizzo wrote: At 8:11, when they decide that Dilddy's previous SO was a father, they (namely Phil) are fairly calm about the decision and then, if you just keep an eye on Dan.... It just sort of feels like he gets nervous/defensive all of the sudden and aggressively yells, "No mums must exist in this universe!!!" IDK. I found it really strange. Appreciated Phil moving on quickly.
heh, you're so right. i would describe that as old-school too, it's funny how that descriptor makes sense (especially in conjunction with 'off camera') but is hard to define.rizzo wrote: Also shout-out to 24:40 and Dan's cute, natural laugh when Phil says "stools" instead of "couches". It felt like a real, warm, off-camera type moment and shot me back to old-school Dan.
oh yeah, i mean this video/potential series is definitely different in that it's explicitly queer/centred around queer relationships and that probably 100% has an effect on how aware of audience reaction they are. i'm (mostly) comfortable with my queerness and fairly vocally out and that anxiety still happens for me often enough, so i'm sure it's infinitely more stressful on them in their much more complicated situation! i just didn't see their slightly different behaviour as anything other than their usual self awareness being a little bit more present than usual bc of that context (basically i'm pretty sure i agree with you and just didn't word it that well lmao)mermaid blood wrote:totally agree, boundaries are and will always be there, we're just witnessing them shift.kai wrote:(definitely agree though that them being very aware of how closely the entire video will be analysed would've affected their behaviour at least a little bit, but. you could say that about pretty much every video they've posted in the last few years, so to me it just feels like they're doing the same thing they've always done, which is sharing exactly what they're comfortable with us getting our hooks into, and nothing more. the boundaries are still there, just more relaxed on a surface level these days.)
this one/this series (if they continue) isn't the same thing they've always done though; they're being analysed not on indirect behaviour but on very direct contextualised responses that they can't tip-toe around. i'm not sure how many people commenting are queer, but it's a type of anxiety that's inexplicable. even if you're secure in yourself, it pops up at the weirdest times when new situations are presented. being ambiguously closeted in plain sight only adds to the confusion. like the 'copacetic' correction, in another video Phil would've had a bigger grin on his face or a little playful teasing with Dan. if he was disinterested or disapproving of the video that would've provided comedic relief, a break in the vibe, but instead he reacted almost distractedly/impatiently which tells me he was still in that 'flight or fight' on-edge buzz, albeit a low level one.
Same! How is this not talked about more.bookfiend wrote:I feel like people aren't acknowledging this enough.
Dan:you know dan and phil, they like to have the raw, naked, experience. They just like to go in. Bare.
Phil:are you saying we're going to have to be blurring some things out?
We're not even a minute in calm the heck down boys.
Also Phil growing a beard. An interesting concept, to go with his new hair style maybe?
Omg good luck!! You can do this!Elyanie wrote: [offtopic]I watched this one with a friend when we both got the notif this morning and we were both giggly messes the whole time watching deppy videos with other fans is the best. I'm planning to ask her out next time I see her, and if I mention it here I hopefully wont chicken out, please give me your courage I'm horrid at these things .[/offtopic]
And Dan saying that the one he prefers is the nice dad, even if it's kind of robotic. Like Phil. (jk) Sorry this doesn't add very much to the conversation, I just couldn't help myselfhello9217 wrote:I'm sorry but can we talk about how Phil said Mat, the coffee shop guy, is his favorite. Like Mat is basically Dan- he likes music and puns and is socially awkward.
Good luck to you!! Honestly, if she's your friend, there'll be a good outcome no matter what happens. But you'll never have any chance of one of those good outcomes or BEST outcome if you don't go for it! Ah, I have too much love for friends turned lovers, in my own life and others. ThanksElyanie wrote:
[offtopic]I'm planning to ask her out next time I see her, and if I mention it here I hopefully wont chicken out, please give me your courage I'm horrid at these things .[/offtopic]